Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27098418›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2016

Parents' Experiences of Receiving the Initial Positive Newborn Screening (NBS) Result for Cystic Fibrosis and Sickle Cell Disease.

Jane Chudleigh, Sarah Buckingham, Jo Dignan, Sandra O'Driscoll, Kemi Johnson, David Rees, Hilary Wyatt, Alison Metcalfe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Guideline
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Jane ChudleighFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK. jane.chudleigh@kcl.ac.uk.
Sarah BuckinghamCystic Fibrosis Paediatric Service, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Jo DignanCystic Fibrosis Paediatric Service, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Sandra O'DriscollDepartment of Paediatric Haematology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Kemi JohnsonSouth East London Sickle Cell and Thalassaemia Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
David ReesDepartment of Paediatric Haematology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Hilary WyattCystic Fibrosis Paediatric Service, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Alison MetcalfeFlorence Nightingale Faculty of Nursing & Midwifery, King's College London, James Clerk Maxwell Building, 57 Waterloo Road, London, SE1 8WA, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The clinical advantages of the newborn screening programme (NBS) in the UK are well described in the literature. However, there has been little exploration of the psychosocial impact on the family. This study followed the principles of grounded theory to explore parents' experiences of receiving the initial positive NBS result for their child with cystic fibrosis (CF) or sickle cell disease (SCD). Semi-structured, qualitative interviews were conducted with 22 parents (12 mothers and 10 fathers) whose children had been diagnosed with CF or SCD via NBS and were under the age of 1 year at the time of interview. The main themes that arose from the data were; parents previous knowledge of the condition and the NBS programme, the method of delivery and parental reactions to the result, sharing the results with others, the impact on parental relationships and support strategies. Study conclusions indicate that most parents thought initial positive NBS results should be delivered by a health professional with condition specific knowledge, preferably with both parents present. Genetic counselling needs to include a focus on the impact of NBS results on parental relationships. Careful consideration needs to be given to strategies to support parents of babies who have positive NBS results both in terms of the psychological health and to assist them in sharing the diagnosis.

Indexed as

Genetic CounselingAdaptation, PsychologicalAdultAnemia, Sickle CellCystic FibrosisFemaleGenetic TestingHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMaleNeonatal ScreeningParentsSurveys and QuestionnairesCystic fibrosisNewborn screeningPsychosocialSickle cell disease

Identifiers

PMID27098418
PMCPMC5114338

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.