Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27098412›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2016

Difference of Electron Capture and Transfer Dissociation Mass Spectrometry on Ni(2+)-, Cu(2+)-, and Zn(2+)-Polyhistidine Complexes in the Absence of Remote Protons.

Daiki Asakawa, Edwin De Pauw

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Replacing HChemical science · 2018
    Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Daiki AsakawaNational Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan. d.asakawa@aist.go.jp.
Edwin De PauwMass Spectrometry Laboratory, Department of Chemistry, and GIGA-Research, University of Liège, B-4000, Liège (Sart-Tilman), Belgium.
National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology · JPUniversity of Liège · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electron capture dissociation (ECD) and electron transfer dissociation (ETD) in metal-peptide complexes are dependent on the metal cation in the complex. The divalent transition metals Ni(2+), Cu(2+), and Zn(2+) were used as charge carriers to produce metal-polyhistidine complexes in the absence of remote protons, since these metal cations strongly bind to neutral histidine residues in peptides. In the case of the ECD and ETD of Cu(2+)-polyhistidine complexes, the metal cation in the complex was reduced and the recombination energy was redistributed throughout the peptide to lead a zwitterionic peptide form having a protonated histidine residue and a deprotonated amide nitrogen. The zwitterion then underwent peptide bond cleavage, producing a and b fragment ions. In contrast, ECD and ETD induced different fragmentation processes in Zn(2+)-polyhistidine complexes. Although the N-Cα bond in the Zn(2+)-polyhistidine complex was cleaved by ETD, ECD of Zn(2+)-polyhistidine induced peptide bond cleavage accompanied with hydrogen atom release. The different fragmentation modes by ECD and ETD originated from the different electronic states of the charge-reduced complexes resulting from these processes. The details of the fragmentation processes were investigated by density functional theory. Graphical Abstract ᅟ.

Indexed as

Density functional theory calculationHydrogen radical lossMetal reductionPeptide bond cleavageZwitterion formation

Identifiers

PMID27098412
OpenAlexW2339313830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.