Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27098368›Full record

ArticleBMC plant biology2016

Analysis of wheat microspore embryogenesis induction by transcriptome and small RNA sequencing using the highly responsive cultivar "Svilena".

Felix Seifert, Sandra Bössow, Jochen Kumlehn, Heike Gnad, Stefan Scholten

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC plant biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. The Class III Peroxidase geneFrontiers in plant science · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. MicroRNA Omics Analysis ofBiomolecules · 2021
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Felix SeifertDevelopmental Biology, Biocenter Klein Flottbek, University of Hamburg, Ohnhorststrasse 18, 22609, Hamburg, Germany.
Sandra BössowSaaten-Union Biotec GmbH, Am Schwabenplan 6, 06466, Seeland, OT Gatersleben, Germany.
Jochen KumlehnPlant Reproductive Biology, Leibnitz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research (IPK), 06466, Seeland, OT Gatersleben, Germany.
Heike GnadSaaten-Union Biotec GmbH, Am Schwabenplan 6, 06466, Seeland, OT Gatersleben, Germany. gnad@saaten-union-biotec.com.
Stefan ScholtenDevelopmental Biology, Biocenter Klein Flottbek, University of Hamburg, Ohnhorststrasse 18, 22609, Hamburg, Germany. s.scholten@uni-hohenheim.de.
Saaten Union (Germany) · DELeibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research · DEUniversität Hamburg · DEUniversity of Hohenheim · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMicrospore embryogenesis describes a stress-induced reprogramming of immature male plant gametophytes to develop into embryo-like structures, which can be regenerated into doubled haploid plants after whole genome reduplication. This mechanism is of high interest for both research as well as plant breeding. The objective of this study was to characterize transcriptional changes and regulatory relationships in early stages of cold stress-induced wheat microspore embryogenesis by transcriptome and small RNA sequencing using a highly responsive cultivar.

resultsTranscriptome and small RNA sequencing was performed in a staged time-course to analyze wheat microspore embryogenesis induction. The analyzed stages were freshly harvested, untreated uninucleate microspores and the two following stages from in vitro anther culture: directly after induction by cold-stress treatment and microspores undergoing the first nuclear divisions. A de novo transcriptome assembly resulted in 29,388 contigs distributing to 20,224 putative transcripts of which 9,305 are not covered by public wheat cDNAs. Differentially expressed transcripts and small RNAs were identified for the stage transitions highlighting various processes as well as specific genes to be involved in microspore embryogenesis induction.

conclusionThis study establishes a comprehensive functional genomics resource for wheat microspore embryogenesis induction and initial understanding of molecular mechanisms involved. A large set of putative transcripts presumably specific for microspore embryogenesis induction as well as contributing processes and specific genes were identified. The results allow for a first insight in regulatory roles of small RNAs in the reprogramming of microspores towards an embryogenic cell fate.

Indexed as

TranscriptomeCluster AnalysisCold TemperatureGene Expression ProfilingGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGene Expression Regulation, PlantGene OntologyMicroRNAsPlant ProteinsPollenRNA, PlantRNA PrecursorsRNA, Small UntranslatedSequence Analysis, RNATriticumMicroRNAsPlant ProteinsRNA, PlantRNA PrecursorsRNA, Small UntranslatedEpigeneticsMicrospore embryogenesis inductionRNA-seqSmall RNAsRNA-seqTranscriptomeWheat

Identifiers

PMID27098368
PMCPMC4839079
OpenAlexW2338901599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.