Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27098353›Full record

ArticleSkeletal radiology2016

Magnetic resonance arthrography and the prevalence of acetabular labral tears in patients 50 years of age and older.

Rohit Jayakar, Alexa Merz, Benjamin Plotkin, Dean Wang, Leanne Seeger, Sharon L Hame

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Skeletal radiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Imaging update on cartilage.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rohit JayakarDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA. rjayakar1@gmail.com.
Alexa MerzDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Benjamin PlotkinDepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Dean WangDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Leanne SeegerDepartment of Radiological Sciences, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Sharon L HameDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
University of California, Los Angeles · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveArthroscopy for acetabular labral tears has minimal impact on pain and function in older patients, especially in the setting of concomitant osteoarthritis. Still, many physicians seek this diagnosis with MR arthrography. Our purpose is to assess the frequency of acetabular labral tears in older patients with hip pain and correlate likelihood of labral pathology with severity of osteoarthritis as visualized on conventional radiograph. MATERIALS AND

methodsFrom 2004 to 2013, 208 hip MRI arthrograms and corresponding radiographs on patients aged 50 years and older were identified. Age, gender, grade and location of labral tear, alpha angle, Tönnis grade, and joint space width were documented. Labral tears and alpha angle were identified and measured on MR arthrogram. Tönnis grade and joint space width were measured on radiographs. RESULTS AND

conclusionsOn MR arthrography, true labral tearing was identified in 73 % of patients. There was some degree of labral pathology in 93.3 % of patients, and this increased to 100 % in patients with moderate to severe osteoarthritis, as defined by Tönnis grade 2-3 or joint space width ≤ 2 mm. There were no statistically significant correlations between labral tear grade and Tönnis grade or joint space width. Given the high frequency of labral pathology and the questionable efficacy of arthroscopic surgical intervention in older patients, MR arthrography should be primarily for those with minimal arthritis on radiograph and potential to benefit from surgery. If further imaging beyond radiographs is necessary in these patients, standard MRI may be a more appropriate imaging tool.

Indexed as

ArthrographyMagnetic Resonance ImagingAcetabulumAgedAged, 80 and overArthroscopyFemaleHip InjuriesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceRetrospective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityAcetabular labrumEconomic and decision analysisHip arthroscopyLabral tearMagnetic resonance imagingMR arthrographyOsteoarthritis

Identifiers

PMID27098353
OpenAlexW2340415541

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.