ArticleJournal of anatomy2016
Exploring metameric variation in human molars: a morphological study using morphometric mapping.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond Linear Measurements: A Multidimensional Framework for Evaluating Sexual Dimorphism in Human Postcanine Tooth Size.Biomedicines · 2026Article
- 3D geometric morphometric analysis of morphological covariation in the modern human postcanine dentition.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Geometric morphometric analysis of maxillary molar sexual dimorphism: A cross-sectional study.PloS one · 2026Article
- An autoencoder and vision transformer based interpretability analysis on the performance differences in automated staging of second and third molars.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Dental Morphology in Restorative Dentistry: A Pilot Study on Morphological Consistency and Variability in Human Upper First Molars.Dentistry journal · 2025Article
- Variation in Molar Size and Proportions in the Hominid Lineage: An Inter- and Intraspecific Approach.Integrative organismal biology (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- Stripe and spot selection in cusp patterning of mammalian molar formation.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Article
- Mapping molar shapes on signaling pathways.PLoS computational biology · 2020Article
- Homology, homoplasy and cusp variability at the enamel-dentine junction of hominoid molars.Journal of anatomy · 2017Article
- The potential of statistical shape modelling for geometric morphometric analysis of human teeth in archaeological research.PloS one · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human molars exhibit a type of metameric variation, which is the difference in serially repeated morphology within an organism. Various theories have been proposed to explain how this variation is brought about in the molars. Actualistic data that support the theories, however, are still relatively scarce because of methodological limitations. Here we propose new methods to analyse detailed tooth crown morphologies. We applied morphometric mapping to the enamel-dentine junction of human maxillary molars and examined whether odontogenetic models were adaptable to human maxillary molars. Our results showed that the upper first molar is phenotypically distinct among the maxillary molars. The average shape of the upper first molar is characterized by four well-defined cusps and precipitous surface relief of the occlusal table. On the other hand, upper third molar is characterized by smooth surface relief of the occlusal table and shows greater shape variation and distinct distribution patterns in morphospace. The upper second molar represents an intermediate state between first and third molar. Size-related shape variation was investigated by the allometric vector analysis, and it appeared that human maxillary molars tend to converge toward the shape of the upper first molar as the size increases. Differences between the upper first molar and the upper second and third molar can thus be largely explained as an effect of allometry. Collectively, these results indicate that the observed pattern of metameric variation in human molars is consistent with odontogenetic models of molar row structure (inhibitory cascade model) and molar crown morphology (patterning cascade model). This study shows that morphometric mapping is a useful tool to visualize and quantify the morphological features of teeth, which can provide the basis for a better understanding of tooth evolution linking morphology and development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.