ArticleHealth research policy and systems2016
Moving knowledge about family violence into public health policy and practice: a mixed method study of a deliberative dialogue.
Article in Health research policy and systems, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
21 citing papers in PubMed.
- Evidence-based clinical encounter vignettes facilitate data collection: In patient-family physician deliberative dialogues.Canadian family physician Medecin de famille canadien · 2026Article
- Introducing family medicine in Tanzania: strengthening primary health care through the 5 Cs-advocacy through a deliberative dialogue symposium-a case study of multinational academic collaboration.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Knowledge translation platforms: Broker, intermediary or more? A scoping review of definitions, functions and characteristics.Health research policy and systems · 2025Article
- Policy options for a pan-Canadian mental health and substance use health workforce strategy.Healthcare management forum · 2025Article
- 'Atawhai': a primary care provider-led response to family violence in Aotearoa New Zealand.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2024Article
- Development of the EVIBEC Learning Outcomes Framework to support the delivery of evidence-based practice curricula in health care professional programmes: a codesign approach.BMC medical education · 2024Review
- An ethical analysis of policy dialogues.Health research policy and systems · 2023Article
- Enhancing Multiple Ways of Knowing Comment on "Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study".International journal of health policy and management · 2023Article
- Evaluating Public Participation in a Deliberative Dialogue: A Single Case Study.International journal of health policy and management · 2022Article
- Open science at the science-policy interface: bringing in the evidence?Health research policy and systems · 2022Review
- Enhancing the capacity of the mental health and substance use health workforce to meet population needs: insights from a facilitated virtual policy dialogue.Health research policy and systems · 2022Article
- Article
- Dynamics of cumulative advantage and threats to equity in open science: a scoping review.Royal Society open science · 2022Article
- An alternate level of care plan: Co-designing components of an intervention with patients, caregivers and providers to address delayed hospital discharge challenges.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2020Article
- Shaping Policy on Chronic Diseases through National Policy Dialogs in CHRODIS PLUS.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020Article
- Policy dialogue as a collaborative tool for multistakeholder health governance: a scoping study.BMJ global health · 2020Review
- Knowledge Translation for Improving the Care of Deinstitutionalized People With Severe Mental Illness in Health Policy.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2019Article
- A deliberative dialogue as a knowledge translation strategy on road traffic injuries in Burkina Faso: a mixed-method evaluation.Health research policy and systems · 2018Article
- Research dissemination workshops: observations and implications based on an experience in Burkina Faso.Health research policy and systems · 2017Article
- Effectively engaging stakeholders and the public in developing violence prevention messages.BMC women's health · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThere is a need to understand scientific evidence in light of the context within which it will be used. Deliberative dialogues are a promising strategy that can be used to meet this evidence interpretation challenge.
methodsWe evaluated a deliberative dialogue held by a transnational violence prevention network. The deliberative dialogue included researchers and knowledge user partners of the Preventing Violence Across the Lifespan (PreVAiL) Research Network and was incorporated into a biennial full-team meeting. The dialogue included pre- and post-meeting activities, as well as deliberations embedded within the meeting agenda. The deliberations included a preparatory plenary session, small group sessions and a synthesizing plenary. The challenge addressed through the process was how to mobilize research to orient health and social service systems to prevent family violence and its consequences. The deliberations focused on the challenge, potential solutions for addressing it and implementation factors. Using a mixed-methods approach, data were collected via questionnaires, meeting minutes, dialogue documents and follow-up telephone interviews.
resultsForty-four individuals (all known to each other and from diverse professional roles, settings and countries) participated in the deliberative dialogue. Ten of the 12 features of the deliberative dialogue were rated favourably by all respondents. The mean behavioural intention score was 5.7 on a scale from 1 (strongly disagree) to 7 (strongly agree), suggesting that many participants intended to use what they learned in their future decision-making. Interviews provided further insight into what might be done to facilitate the use of research in the violence prevention arena.
conclusionFindings suggest that participants will use dialogue learnings to influence practice and policy change. Deliberative dialogues may be a viable strategy for collaborative sensemaking of research related to family violence prevention, and other public health topics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.