Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27098066›Full record

Trial reportSchizophrenia bulletin2016

Prefrontal Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation for Treatment of Schizophrenia With Predominant Negative Symptoms: A Double-Blind, Sham-Controlled Proof-of-Concept Study.

Ulrich Palm, Daniel Keeser, Alkomiet Hasan, Michael J Kupka, Janusch Blautzik, Nina Sarubin, Filipa Kaymakanova, Ina Unger, Peter Falkai, Thomas Meindl and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Schizophrenia bulletin, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06349369 (Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 11 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 11 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06349369 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Effect of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) on Inflammatory Biomarkers in Chronic Schizophrenia: A Randomised Double-Blind Controlled Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorAll India Institute of Medical Sciences, BhubaneswarRan2024 to 2026Enrolled60ConditionsChronic SchizophreniaArmstranscranial direct current stimulation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 11 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Pooled it
  11. Pooled it
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Ulrich PalmDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany; ulrich.palm@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Daniel KeeserInstitute for Clinical Radiology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany;
Alkomiet Hasan
Michael J KupkaInstitute for Clinical Radiology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany;
Janusch BlautzikInstitute for Clinical Radiology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany;
Nina SarubinHochschule Fresenius, University of Applied Sciences, Psychology School, Munich, Germany.
Filipa Kaymakanova
Ina Unger
Peter Falkai
Thomas MeindlInstitute for Clinical Radiology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany;
Birgit Ertl-WagnerInstitute for Clinical Radiology, Ludwig Maximilian University Munich, Munich, Germany;
Frank Padberg

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Negative symptoms are highly relevant in the long-term course of schizophrenia and are an important target domain for the development of novel interventions. Recently, transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the prefrontal cortex has been investigated as a treatment option in schizophrenia. In this proof-of-concept study, 20 schizophrenia patients with predominantly negative symptoms were randomized to either 10 sessions of add-on active (2 mA, 20min) or sham tDCS (anode: left DLPFC/F3; cathode: right supraorbital/F4). Primary outcome measure was the change in the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS) sum score; secondary outcomes included reduction in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) scores and improvement of depressive symptoms, cognitive processing speed, and executive functioning. Sixteen patients underwent 4 functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) scans (pre and post 1st and pre and post 10th tDCS) to investigate changes in resting state network connectivity after tDCS. Per-protocol analysis showed a significantly greater decrease in SANS score after active (-36.1%) than after sham tDCS (-0.7%). PANSS sum scores decreased significantly more with active (-23.4%) than with sham stimulation (-2.2%). Explorative analysis of fcMRI data indicated changes in subgenual cortex and dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) connectivity within frontal-thalamic-temporo-parietal networks. The results of this first proof-of-concept study indicate that prefrontal tDCS may be a promising intervention for treatment of schizophrenia with predominant negative symptoms. Large-scale randomized controlled studies are needed to further establish prefrontal tDCS as novel treatment for negative symptoms in schizophrenia.

Indexed as

Outcome Assessment, Health CareAdultConnectomeDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleMiddle AgedNerve NetPrefrontal CortexSchizophreniaTranscranial Direct Current StimulationYoung Adultfunctional connectivity MRI—fcMRInegative symptomsresting-state networksschizophreniatranscranial direct current stimulation—tDCS

Identifiers

PMID27098066
PMCPMC4988747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.