ArticleJournal of neural engineering2016
Optimization of return electrodes in neurostimulating arrays.
Article in Journal of neural engineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- A three-dimensional bipolar microneedle electrode array with local ground integrated at each sidewall for enhanced focal electric stimulation.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025Article
- Ultrathin rubbery bio-optoelectronic stimulators for untethered cardiac stimulation.Science advances · 2024Article
- Focal stimulation of retinal ganglion cells using subretinal 3D microelectrodes with peripheral electrodes of opposite current.Biomedical engineering letters · 2024Article
- Electronic Retinal Prostheses.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2023Review
- Photovoltaic implant simulator reveals resolution limits in subretinal prosthesis.Journal of neural engineering · 2022Article
- Micelle-enabled self-assembly of porous and monolithic carbon membranes for bioelectronic interfaces.Nature nanotechnology · 2021Article
- Evaluating Current Density Modeling of Non-Invasive Eye and Brain Electrical Stimulation Using Phosphene Thresholds.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021Article
- Computational challenges and opportunities for a bi-directional artificial retina.Journal of neural engineering · 2020Article
- Stimulation Strategies for Improving the Resolution of Retinal Prostheses.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Review
- Spatiotemporal integration of visual stimuli and its relevance to the use of a divisional power supply scheme for retinal prosthesis.PloS one · 2020Article
- Vertically integrated photo junction-field-effect transistor pixels for retinal prosthesis.Biomedical optics express · 2020Article
- Characteristics of prosthetic vision in rats with subretinal flat and pillar electrode arrays.Journal of neural engineering · 2019Article
- Honeycomb-shaped electro-neural interface enables cellular-scale pixels in subretinal prosthesis.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Epiretinal stimulation with local returns enhances selectivity at cellular resolution.Journal of neural engineering · 2019Article
- Protuberant Electrode Structures for Subretinal Electrical Stimulation: Modeling, Fabrication andFrontiers in neuroscience · 2019Article
- Optimization of pillar electrodes in subretinal prosthesis for enhanced proximity to target neurons.Journal of neural engineering · 2018Article
- Development of visual Neuroprostheses: trends and challenges.Bioelectronic medicine · 2018Review
- Fractal Electrodes as a Generic Interface for Stimulating Neurons.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Electronic approaches to restoration of sight.Reports on progress in physics. Physical Society (Great Britain) · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHigh resolution visual prostheses require dense stimulating arrays with localized inputs of individual electrodes. We study the electric field produced by multielectrode arrays in electrolyte to determine an optimal configuration of return electrodes and activation sequence. APPROACH: To determine the boundary conditions for computation of the electric field in electrolyte, we assessed current dynamics using an equivalent circuit of a multielectrode array with interleaved return electrodes. The electric field modeled with two different boundary conditions derived from the equivalent circuit was then compared to measurements of electric potential in electrolyte. To assess the effect of return electrode configuration on retinal stimulation, we transformed the computed electric fields into retinal response using a model of neural network-mediated stimulation. MAIN
resultsElectric currents at the capacitive electrode-electrolyte interface redistribute over time, so that boundary conditions transition from equipotential surfaces at the beginning of the pulse to uniform current density in steady state. Experimental measurements confirmed that, in steady state, the boundary condition corresponds to a uniform current density on electrode surfaces. Arrays with local return electrodes exhibit improved field confinement and can elicit stronger network-mediated retinal response compared to those with a common remote return. Connecting local return electrodes enhances the field penetration depth and allows reducing the return electrode area. Sequential activation of the pixels in large monopolar arrays reduces electrical cross-talk and improves the contrast in pattern stimulation. SIGNIFICANCE: Accurate modeling of multielectrode arrays helps optimize the electrode configuration to maximize the spatial resolution, contrast and dynamic range of retinal prostheses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.