Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27097926›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2016

Individual differences in boldness influence patterns of social interactions and the transmission of cuticular bacteria among group-mates.

Carl N Keiser, Noa Pinter-Wollman, David A Augustine, Michael J Ziemba, Lingran Hao, Jeffrey G Lawrence, Jonathan N Pruitt

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
8.4field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. A guide to choosing and implementing reference models for social network analysis.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2021
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. The Inclusive Behavioral Immune System.Frontiers in psychology · 2019
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Collective behavior and colony persistence of social spiders depends on their physical environment.Behavioral ecology : official journal of the International Society for Behavioral Ecology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Carl N KeiserDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA cnk21@pitt.edu.
Noa Pinter-WollmanBioCircuits Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
David A AugustineDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Michael J ZiembaDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Lingran HaoBioCircuits Institute, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA.
Jeffrey G LawrenceDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA.
Jonathan N PruittDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260, USA Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.
University of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of California, San Diego · US

Funding

Modeling how keystone individuals emerge and influence disease transmissionR01GM115509 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI PINTER-WOLLMAN, NOA MICHAL · 2016 to 2020
$2.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM115509
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the importance of host attributes for the likelihood of associated microbial transmission, individual variation is seldom considered in studies of wildlife disease. Here, we test the influence of host phenotypes on social network structure and the likelihood of cuticular bacterial transmission from exposed individuals to susceptible group-mates using female social spiders (Stegodyphus dumicola). Based on the interactions of resting individuals of known behavioural types, we assessed whether individuals assorted according to their behavioural traits. We found that individuals preferentially interacted with individuals of unlike behavioural phenotypes. We next applied a green fluorescent protein-transformed cuticular bacterium,Pantoeasp., to individuals and allowed them to interact with an unexposed colony-mate for 24 h. We found evidence for transmission of bacteria in 55% of cases. The likelihood of transmission was influenced jointly by the behavioural phenotypes of both the exposed and susceptible individuals: transmission was more likely when exposed spiders exhibited higher 'boldness' relative to their colony-mate, and when unexposed individuals were in better body condition. Indirect transmission via shared silk took place in only 15% of cases. Thus, bodily contact appears key to transmission in this system. These data represent a fundamental step towards understanding how individual traits influence larger-scale social and epidemiological dynamics.

Indexed as

AnimalsFemalePantoeaPhenotypeSilkSocial BehaviorSpidersSilkassortativitybacterial transmissionboldnesssocial network analysissocial spidertransmission heterogeneity

Identifiers

PMID27097926
PMCPMC4855390
OpenAlexW2337901246

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.