Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27097734›Full record

ArticleJournal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England)2016

Perseveration by NK1R-/- ('knockout') mice is blunted by doses of methylphenidate that affect neither other aspects of their cognitive performance nor the behaviour of wild-type mice in the 5-Choice Continuous Performance Test.

Katharine Pillidge, Ashley J Porter, Jared W Young, S Clare Stanford

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Modelling ADHD-Like Phenotypes in Zebrafish.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Review
  5. Animal Models of ADHD?Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  6. Control of impulsivity by GCommunications biology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katharine PillidgeDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK.
Ashley J PorterDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK.
Jared W YoungDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA Research Service, VA San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, CA, USA.
S Clare StanfordDepartment of Neuroscience, Physiology and Pharmacology, University College London, London, UK c.stanford@ucl.ac.uk.
University College London · GBVA San Diego Healthcare System · US

Funding

Medical Research Council G0801038
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The underlying cause(s) of abnormalities expressed by patients with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) have yet to be delineated. One factor that has been associated with increased vulnerability to ADHD is polymorphism(s) of TACR1, which is the human equivalent of the rodent NK1 (substance P-preferring) receptor gene (Nk1r). We have reported previously that genetically altered mice, lacking functional NK1R (NK1R-/-), express locomotor hyperactivity, which was blunted by the first-line treatment for ADHD, methylphenidate. Here, we compared the effects of this psychostimulant (3, 10 and 30 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) on the behaviour of NK1R-/- mice and their wild types in the 5-Choice Continuous Performance Test, which emulates procedures used to study attention and response control in ADHD patients. Methylphenidate increased total trials (a measure of 'productivity') completed by wild types, but not by NK1R-/- mice. Conversely, this drug reduced perseveration by NK1R-/- mice, but not by wild types. Other drug-induced changes in key behaviours were not genotype dependent, especially at the highest dose: for example, % omissions (an index of inattentiveness) was increased, whereas % false alarms and % premature responses (measures of impulsivity) declined in both genotypes, indicating reduced overall response. These findings are discussed in the context of the efficacy of methylphenidate in the treatment of ADHD. Moreover, they lead to several testable proposals. First, methylphenidate does not improve attention in a subgroup of ADHD patients with a functional deficit of TACR1. Second, these patients do not express excessive false alarms when compared with other groups of subjects, but they do express excessive perseveration, which would be ameliorated by methylphenidate.

Indexed as

AnimalsAttention Deficit Disorder with HyperactivityBehavior, AnimalCentral Nervous System StimulantsChoice BehaviorCognitionDisease Models, AnimalDose-Response Relationship, DrugGenotypeImpulsive BehaviorInjections, IntraperitonealMaleMethylphenidateMiceMice, Inbred C57BLMice, KnockoutCentral Nervous System StimulantsMethylphenidateReceptors, Neurokinin-1ADHDfalse alarmsimpulsivityinattentivenessNK1 receptorperseverationpremature responses

Identifiers

PMID27097734
PMCPMC4994704
OpenAlexW2337726252

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.