Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27097726›Full record

ArticleImplementation science : IS2016

Finding what works: identification of implementation strategies for the integration of methadone maintenance therapy and HIV services in Vietnam.

Vivian F Go, Giuliana J Morales, Nguyen Tuyet Mai, Ross C Brownson, Tran Viet Ha, William C Miller

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation science : IS, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vivian F GoDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA. vgo@email.unc.edu.
Giuliana J MoralesDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Nguyen Tuyet MaiDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Ross C BrownsonPrevention Research Center in St. Louis, Brown School, Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Tran Viet HaDepartment of Health Behavior, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
William C MillerDepartment of Epidemiology, University of North Carolina Gillings School of Global Public Health, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.

Funding

Virology, Immunology, and Microbiology CoreP30AI050410 · NIAID · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI DAVID M. MARGOLIS · 2001 to 2026
$76.9M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI050410NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI50410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntegration of methadone maintenance therapy (MMT) and HIV services is an evidence-based intervention (EBI) that benefits HIV care and reduces costs. While MMT/HIV integration is recommended by the World Health Organization and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, it is not widely implemented, due to organizational and operational barriers. Our study applied an innovative process to identify implementation strategies to address these barriers.

methodsOur process was adapted from the Expert Recommendations for Implementing Change (ERIC) protocol and consisted of two main phases. In Phase 1, we conducted 16 in-depth interviews with stakeholders and developed matrices to display barriers to integration. In Phase 2, we selected implementation strategies that addressed the barriers identified in Phase 1 and conducted a poll to vote on the most important and feasible strategies among a panel with expertise in cultural context and implementation science.

resultsBarriers fell into two broad categories: policy and programmatic. At the policy level, barriers included lack of a national mandate, different structures (MMT vs. HIV clinic) for cost reimbursement and staff salaries, and resistance on the part of staff to take on additional tasks without compensation. Programmatic barriers included the need for cross-training in MMT and HIV tasks, staff accountability, and commitment from local leaders. In Phase 2, we focused on programmatic challenges. Based on voting results and iterative dialogue with our expert panel, we selected several implementation strategies in the domains of technical assistance, staff accountability, and local commitment that targeted these barriers.

conclusionsKey programmatic barriers to MMT/HIV integration in Vietnam may be addressed through implementation strategies that focus on technical assistance, staff accountability, and local commitment. Our process of identifying implementation strategies was simple, low cost, and potentially replicable to other settings.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityHealth Plan ImplementationHIV InfectionsHumansInterviews as TopicMethadoneOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersVietnamMethadoneImplementation researchImplementation scienceImplementation strategiesMMT/HIV integrationPeople who inject drugsVietnam

Identifiers

PMID27097726
PMCPMC4837557

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.