Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27097717›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

Use of handheld X-ray fluorescence as a non-invasive method to distinguish between Asian and African elephant tusks.

Kittisak Buddhachat, Chatchote Thitaram, Janine L Brown, Sarisa Klinhom, Pakkanut Bansiddhi, Kitichaya Penchart, Kanita Ouitavon, Khanittha Sriaksorn, Chalermpol Pa-in, Budsabong Kanchanasaka and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Determining the Provenance of Traded Wildlife in the Philippines.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2023
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Kittisak BuddhachatAnimal Bone and Joint Research Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Biosciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.
Chatchote ThitaramCenter of Excellence in Elephant Research and Education, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.
Janine L BrownSmithsonian Conservation Biology Institute, Center for Species Survival, 1500 Remount Road, Front Royal, VA 22630, USA.
Sarisa KlinhomCenter of Excellence in Elephant Research and Education, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.
Pakkanut BansiddhiCenter of Excellence in Elephant Research and Education, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.
Kitichaya PenchartDNP Wildlife Forensic Science Unit (DNP-WIFOS), Wildlife Research Division, Wildlife Conservation Office, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation. 61 Phaholyothin Rd., Chatuchak Bangkok 10900 Thailand.
Kanita OuitavonDNP Wildlife Forensic Science Unit (DNP-WIFOS), Wildlife Research Division, Wildlife Conservation Office, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation. 61 Phaholyothin Rd., Chatuchak Bangkok 10900 Thailand.
Khanittha SriaksornDNP Wildlife Forensic Science Unit (DNP-WIFOS), Wildlife Research Division, Wildlife Conservation Office, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation. 61 Phaholyothin Rd., Chatuchak Bangkok 10900 Thailand.
Chalermpol Pa-inWildlife Research Division, Wildlife Conservation Office, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation. 61 Phaholyothin Rd., Chatuchak Bangkok 10900 Thailand.
Budsabong KanchanasakaWildlife Research Division, Wildlife Conservation Office, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation. 61 Phaholyothin Rd., Chatuchak Bangkok 10900 Thailand.
Chaleamchat SomgirdCenter of Excellence in Elephant Research and Education, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.
Korakot NganvongpanitAnimal Bone and Joint Research Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Biosciences and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe the use of handheld X-ray fluorescence, for elephant tusk species identification. Asian (n = 72) and African (n = 85) elephant tusks were scanned and we utilized the species differences in elemental composition to develop a functional model differentiating between species with high precision. Spatially, the majority of measured elements (n = 26) exhibited a homogeneous distribution in cross-section, but a more heterologous pattern in the longitudinal direction. Twenty-one of twenty four elements differed between Asian and African samples. Data were subjected to hierarchical cluster analysis followed by a stepwise discriminant analysis, which identified elements for the functional equation. The best equation consisted of ratios of Si, S, Cl, Ti, Mn, Ag, Sb and W, with Zr as the denominator. Next, Bayesian binary regression model analysis was conducted to predict the probability that a tusk would be of African origin. A cut-off value was established to improve discrimination. This Bayesian hybrid classification model was then validated by scanning an additional 30 Asian and 41 African tusks, which showed high accuracy (94%) and precision (95%) rates. We conclude that handheld XRF is an accurate, non-invasive method to discriminate origin of elephant tusks provides rapid results applicable to use in the field.

Indexed as

ElephantsFluorescenceFluorometryX-RaysAfricaAnimalsAsiaFemaleMale

Identifiers

PMID27097717
PMCPMC4838944

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.