Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27097273›Full record

ReviewAmerican journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics2016

The Drosophila melanogaster model for Cornelia de Lange syndrome: Implications for etiology and therapeutics.

Dale Dorsett

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in American journal of medical genetics. Part C, Seminars in medical genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. A Novel Mutation inJournal of pediatric genetics · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Dale Dorsett
Saint Louis University · ES

Funding

VERTEBRATE ANIMAL MODELS OF CORNELIA DE LANGE SYNDROMEP01HD052860 · NICHD · CHILDREN'S HOSP OF PHILADELPHIA · PI KRANTZ, IAN D. · 2006 to 2015
$11.2M
Cohesin Dynamics and Transcriptional Enhancer FunctionR01GM108714 · NIGMS · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI DORSETT, DALE L · 2015 to 2018
$1.2M
Cohesin Polycomb Interactions in Gene RegulationR01GM108872 · NIGMS · SAINT LOUIS UNIVERSITY · PI DORSETT, DALE L · 2014 to 2017
$1.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P01 HD052860NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108714NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM108872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Discovery of genetic alterations that cause human birth defects provide key opportunities to improve the diagnosis, treatment, and family counseling. Frequently, however, these opportunities are limited by the lack of knowledge about the normal functions of the affected genes. In many cases, there is more information about the gene's orthologs in model organisms, including Drosophila melanogaster. Despite almost a billion years of evolutionary divergence, over three-quarters of genes linked to human diseases have Drosophila homologs. With a short generation time, a twenty-fold smaller genome, and unique genetic tools, the conserved functions of genes are often more easily elucidated in Drosophila than in other organisms. Here we present how this applies to Cornelia de Lange syndrome, as a model for how Drosophila can be used to increase understanding of genetic syndromes caused by mutations with broad effects on gene transcription and exploited to develop novel therapies. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AnimalsDe Lange SyndromeDisease Models, AnimalDrosophila melanogasterGenetic Diseases, InbornGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMutationAFF4CHOP syndromecohesinNIPBLNipped-B

Identifiers

PMID27097273
PMCPMC5105159
OpenAlexW2344103441

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.