ArticleLanguage, speech, and hearing services in schools2016
Feasibility of a Recasting and Auditory Bombardment Treatment With Young Cochlear Implant Users.
Article in Language, speech, and hearing services in schools, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of Intensive Linguistic Intervention in Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Case Study.Children (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Five Additional Evidence-Based Principles to Facilitate Grammar Development for Children With Developmental Language Disorder.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2024Article
- Less Versus More: The Effect of Recast Length in Treatment of Grammatical Errors.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2024Article
- Systematic Literature Review and Early Benefit of Cochlear Implantation in Two Pediatric Auditory Neuropathy Cases.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023Article
- Feedback Processing During Probabilistic Learning in Children With Developmental Language Disorder: An Event-Related Potential Study.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Translating Enhanced Conversational Recast to a Telepractice Setting.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2022Article
- Oral Language Acquisition in Preschool Children Who are Deaf and Hard-of-Hearing.Journal of deaf studies and deaf education · 2022Article
- Predictors of Treatment Response for Preschool Children With Developmental Language Disorder.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2020Article
- Lexical Repetition Properties of Caregiver Speech and Language Development in Children With Cochlear Implants.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2020Article
- Maximizing Treatment Efficiency in Developmental Language Disorder: Positive Effects in Half the Time.American journal of speech-language pathology · 2019Article
- Individual Versus Small Group Treatment of Morphological Errors for Children With Developmental Language Disorder.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2019Article
- Effect of cochlear implantation on language development and assessment of the quality of studies in this field: A systematic review.Medical journal of the Islamic Republic of Iran · 2019Review
- Service Provision for Children Who Are Hard of Hearing at Preschool and Elementary School Ages.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2018Article
- Effective Use of Auditory Bombardment as a Therapy Adjunct for Children With Developmental Language Disorders.Language, speech, and hearing services in schools · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThere is little to guide clinicians in terms of evidence-based interventions for children with cochlear implants who demonstrate morpheme errors. This feasibility study tested the utility of a treatment targeting grammatical morpheme errors.
methodThree children (ages 4-5 years) received Enhanced Conversational Recast treatment, a version of conversational recast treatment that focuses on a single morpheme error at a time, emphasizes attention to clinician input, and uses high linguistic variability with clinician input. A period of recasting was followed by 24 auditory presentations of the target morpheme in short sentences. After an initial baseline period, children were treated in individual sessions over 21-26 days.
resultsAll children showed improved use of targeted grammatical morpheme use, both in elicited contexts and in terms of spontaneous use. Spontaneous use was best for the 2 children who were implanted earliest and whose audiograms showed the best hearing postimplant. Performance by a 3rd child diagnosed with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder was more variable but still showed positive change.
conclusionsThe results indicate that the treatment can be effective for children with cochlear implants. The pattern of results across children also suggests potential variables that may moderate treatment effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.