Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27096846›Full record

ArticlePloS one2016

How Do General Practitioners Conceptualise Advance Care Planning in Their Practice? A Qualitative Study.

Aline De Vleminck, Koen Pardon, Kim Beernaert, Dirk Houttekier, Robert Vander Stichele, Luc Deliens

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Yonder: Advance care planning, osteopathy, HPV vaccination, and international medical graduates.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aline De VleminckEnd-of-Life Care Research group, Ghent University & Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Koen PardonEnd-of-Life Care Research group, Ghent University & Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Kim BeernaertEnd-of-Life Care Research group, Ghent University & Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Dirk HouttekierEnd-of-Life Care Research group, Ghent University & Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Robert Vander SticheleEnd-of-Life Care Research group, Ghent University & Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.
Luc DeliensEnd-of-Life Care Research group, Ghent University & Vrije Universiteit Brussel (VUB), Brussels, Belgium.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore how GPs conceptualise advance care planning (ACP), based on their experiences with ACP in their practice.

methodsFive focus groups were held with 36 GPs. Discussions were analysed using a constant comparative method.

resultsFour overarching themes in the conceptualisations of ACP were discerned: (1) the organisation of professional care required to meet patients' needs, (2) the process of preparing for death and discussing palliative care options, (3) the discussion of care goals and treatment decisions, (4) the completion of advance directives. Within these themes, ACP was both conceptualised in terms of content of ACP and/or in terms of tasks for the GP. A specific task that was mentioned throughout the discussion of the four different themes was (5) the task of actively initiating ACP by the GP versus passively waiting for patients' initiation.

conclusionsThis study illustrates that GPs have varying conceptualisations of ACP, of which some are more limited to specific aspects of ACP. A shared conceptualisation and agreement on the purpose and goals of ACP is needed to ensure successful implementation, as well as a systematic integration of ACP in routine practice that could lead to a better uptake of all the important elements of ACP.

Indexed as

Advance Care PlanningGeneral PractitionersAdultAgedFemaleFocus GroupsHumansMaleMiddle AgedPalliative CarePhysician-Patient RelationsQualitative Research

Identifiers

PMID27096846
PMCPMC4838248

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.