Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27096250›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2016

Pharmacokinetics of lamotrigine and its metabolite N-2-glucuronide: Influence of polymorphism of UDP-glucuronosyltransferases and drug transporters.

Daniela Milosheska, Bogdan Lorber, Tomaž Vovk, Matej Kastelic, Vita Dolžan, Iztok Grabnar

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.7field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Understanding Lamotrigine's Role in the CNS and Possible Future Evolution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Daniela MilosheskaFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, 1000, Ljubljana.
Bogdan LorberDepartment of Neurology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, 1000, Ljubljana.
Tomaž VovkFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, 1000, Ljubljana.
Matej KastelicFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Biochemistry, University of Ljubljana, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Vita DolžanFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Biochemistry, University of Ljubljana, 1000, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Iztok GrabnarFaculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, 1000, Ljubljana.
University of Ljubljana · SILjubljana University Medical Centre · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThis study aimed to develop a population pharmacokinetic model for quantitative evaluation of the influence of genetic variants in metabolic enzymes and transporters on lamotrigine pharmacokinetics while taking into account the influence of various clinical, biochemical and demographic factors.

methodsWe included 100 patients with epilepsy on stable dosing with lamotrigine as mono or adjunctive therapy. Lamotrigine and lamotrigine N-2-glucuronide concentrations were determined in up to two plasma samples per patient. Patients were genotyped for UGT1A4, UGT2B7, ABCB1 and SLC22A1. Population pharmacokinetic analysis was performed by non-linear mixed effects modelling. Prior knowledge from previous pharmacokinetic studies was incorporated to stabilize the modelling process. A parent-metabolite model was developed to get a more detailed view on the covariate effects on lamotrigine metabolism.

resultsWith a base model absorption rate (interindividual variability) was estimated at 1.96 h(-1) (72.8%), oral clearance at 2.32 l h(-1) (41.4%) and distribution volume at 77.6 l (30.2%). Lamotrigine clearance was associated with genetic factors, patient's weight, renal function, smoking and co-treatment with enzyme inducing or inhibiting drugs. In patients with UGT2B7-161TT genotype clearance was lower compared with GT and GG genotypes. Clearance was particularly high in patients with UGT2B7 372 GG genotype (compared with AA genotype it was 117%; 95% CI 44.8, 247% higher).

conclusionsVariability in lamotrigine pharmacokinetics is large and quantification of its sources may lead to more precise individual treatment. Genotyping for UGT2B7 may be useful in various clinical settings.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAnticonvulsantsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BEpilepsyFemaleGenotypeGlucuronosyltransferaseHumansLamotrigineMaleMiddle AgedModels, BiologicalOrganic Cation Transporter 1Prospective StudiesABCB1 protein, humanAnticonvulsantsATP Binding Cassette Transporter, Subfamily BGlucuronosyltransferaseLamotriginelamotrigine 2-N-glucuronideOrganic Cation Transporter 1Triazinesepilepsylamotriginemetabolismpharmacogeneticspopulation pharmacokinetics

Identifiers

PMID27096250
PMCPMC4972156
OpenAlexW2345509012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.