Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27096139›Full record

ReviewEye and vision (London, England)2016

PACK-CXL: Corneal cross-linking in infectious keratitis.

David Tabibian, Cosimo Mazzotta, Farhad Hafezi

Registry-linked trialOpen access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Eye and vision (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05881187 (Analysis of the Outcomes of Photoactivated Chromophore for Keratitis Cross _linking for Treatment of Infectious Keratitis), which is not on this map. Cited by 33 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
9.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05881187 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Analysis of the Outcomes of Photoactivated Chromophore for Keratitis Cross _linking for Treatment of Infectious Keratitis

TypeinterventionalSponsorSohag UniversityRan2023 to 2024Enrolled60ConditionsInfectoius KeratitisArmsRiboflavin, Antibotice.g vigamox ED Antifungal e.g Dflucan, pack cross linking
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Journal of clinical medicine · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

David TabibianLaboratory for Ocular Cell Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland ; Department of Ophthalmology, Northampton General Hospital, Northampton, United Kingdom.
Cosimo MazzottaSiena Crosslinking Center, Siena University Hospital, Siena, Italy.
Farhad HafeziLaboratory for Ocular Cell Biology, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland ; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA USA ; EyeCare Laboratory Research Zurich Associates (ELZA) Institute, Webereistrasse 2, 8953 Dietikon, Switzerland.
University of Geneva · CHUniversity of Siena · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCorneal cross-linking (CXL) using ultraviolet light-A (UV-A) and riboflavin is a technique developed in the 1990's to treat corneal ectatic disorders such as keratoconus. It soon became the new gold standard in multiple countries around the world to halt the progression of this disorder, with good long-term outcomes in keratometry reading and visual acuity. The original Dresden treatment protocol was also later on used to stabilize iatrogenic corneal ectasia appearing after laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) and photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). CXL efficiently strengthened the cornea but was also shown to kill most of the keratocytes within the corneal stroma, later on repopulated by those cells. REVIEW: Ultraviolet-light has long been known for its microbicidal effect, and thus CXL postulated to be able to sterilize the cornea from infectious pathogens. This cytotoxic effect led to the first clinical trials using CXL to treat advanced infectious melting corneal keratitis. Patients treated with this technique showed, in the majority of cases, a stabilization of the melting process and were able to avoid emergent à chaud keratoplasty. Following those primary favorable results, CXL was used to treat beginning bacterial keratitis as a first-line treatment without any adjunctive antibiotics with positive results for most patients. In order to distinguish the use of CXL for infectious keratitis treatment from its use for corneal ectatic disorders, a new term was proposed at the 9th CXL congress in Dublin to rename its use in infections as photoactivated chromophore for infectious keratitis -corneal collagen cross-linking (PACK-CXL).

conclusionPACK-CXL is now more frequently used to treat infections from various infectious origins. The original Dresden protocol is still used for this purpose. Careful modifications of this protocol could improve the efficiency of this technique in specific clinical situations regarding certain types of pathogens.

Indexed as

Corneal cross-linkingCorneal ulcerCXLInfectious KeratitisKeratoconusPACK-CXLRiboflavinUltraviolet light A

Identifiers

PMID27096139
PMCPMC4836155
OpenAlexW2342315455

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.