Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27096027›Full record

ArticleClinical epigenetics2016

Defining the criteria for identifying constitutional epimutations.

Mathew A Sloane, Robyn L Ward, Luke B Hesson

Open access · goldAbstract readLetter
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical epigenetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Cancers · 2021
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mathew A SloaneAdult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre and Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Australia, Kensington, Sydney, New South Wales 2052 Australia.
Robyn L WardThe University of Queensland, Level 3 Brian Wilson Chancellery, Brisbane, Queensland 4072 Australia.
Luke B HessonAdult Cancer Program, Lowy Cancer Research Centre and Prince of Wales Clinical School, UNSW Australia, Kensington, Sydney, New South Wales 2052 Australia.
UNSW Sydney · AUUniversity of Queensland · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the January 2016 issue of Clinical Epigenetics, Quiñonez-Silva et al. (Clin Epigenetics 8:1, 2016) described a possible constitutional epimutation of the RB1 gene as a cause of hereditary predisposition to retinoblastoma. The term constitutional epimutation describes an epigenetic aberration in normal tissues that predisposes to disease. The data presented by Quiñonez-Silva et al. are interesting, but further analysis is required to demonstrate a constitutional epimutation in this family. Here, we define the criteria and describe the experimental approach necessary to identify an epigenetic aberration as a constitutional epimutation.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationMutationEpigenesis, GeneticGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansConstitutional epimutationMethylationRB1Retinoblastoma

Identifiers

PMID27096027
PMCPMC4835913
OpenAlexW2341329616

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.