Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27095935›Full record

ArticleContemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland)2016

Bioinformatics analysis of the gene expression profile of hepatocellular carcinoma: preliminary results.

Jia Li, Zhongxi Huang, Lixin Wei

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Contemporary oncology (Poznan, Poland), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jia LiDepartment of Pathology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China; Medical College, Nankai University, Tianjing, China.
Zhongxi HuangInstitute of Oncology, Nanfang Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.
Lixin WeiDepartment of Pathology, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Chinese PLA General Hospital · CNNanfang Hospital · CNNankai University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aim of the studyTo analyse the expression profile of hepatocellular carcinoma compared with normal liver by using bioinformatics methods. MATERIAL AND

methodsIn this study, we analysed the microarray expression data of HCC and adjacent normal liver samples from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database to screen for differentially expressed genes. Then, functional analyses were performed using GenCLiP analysis, Gene Ontology categories, and aberrant pathway identification. In addition, we used the CMap database to identify small molecules that can induce HCC.

resultsOverall, 2721 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were identified. We found 180 metastasis-related genes and constructed co-occurrence networks. Several significant pathways, including the transforming growth factor β (TGF-β) signalling pathway, were identified as closely related to these DEGs. Some candidate small molecules (such as betahistine) were identified that might provide a basis for developing HCC treatments in the future.

conclusionsAlthough we functionally analysed the differences in the gene expression profiles of HCC and normal liver tissues, our study is essentially preliminary, and it may be premature to apply our results to clinical trials. Further research and experimental testing are required in future studies.

Indexed as

bioinformatics analysisdifferentially expressed genesfunctional analysishepatocellular carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID27095935
PMCPMC4829745
OpenAlexW2332515205

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.