Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27095914›Full record

ReviewEuropean journal of dentistry

Role of Salvadora persica chewing stick (miswak): A natural toothbrush for holistic oral health.

Fayez Niazi, Mustafa Naseem, Zohaib Khurshid, Muhammad S Zafar, Khalid Almas

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European journal of dentistry. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Plaque Removal and Gingival Bleeding Using Biodegradable Toothbrushes: Salvadora persica, Bamboo, and Nylon: A Comparative Study.Medical science monitor : international medical journal of experimental and clinical research · 2024
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Knowledge, Awareness, and Practice Towards the Use ofHealthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fayez NiaziDepartment of Oral Biology, Liaquat College of Medicine and Dentistry, Karachi, Pakistan.
Mustafa NaseemDepartment of Community and Preventive Dentistry, Ziauddin College of Dentistry, Karachi, Pakistan.
Zohaib KhurshidDepartment of Biomaterials, School of Metallurgy and Materials, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Muhammad S ZafarDepartment of Restorative Dentistry, College of Dentistry, Taibah University, Madinah Al Munawwarah, Saudi Arabia.
Khalid AlmasDepartment of Periodontology, College of Dentistry, University of Dammam, Dammam, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From an ancient tool to a modern way of improving oral health, miswak (chewing stick) has proven to be an effective tool for oral health. The miswak removes the bacterial plaque by mechanical and chemical actions. It provides a cheap and easily accessible way of improving oral health of the individuals and populations. The use of miswak was promoted centuries ago by Prophet Muhammad (Peace be Upon Him). In the modern era, the beneficial role of using miswak such as antiseptic, antimicrobial, anticariogenic and analgesic effects have been proven scientifically. This article reviews the various oral health benefits of miswak in the light of religious, scientific and social evidences.

Indexed as

Carieschemotherapyoral hygieneperiodontal health

Identifiers

PMID27095914
PMCPMC4813453

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.