ArticleThe Journal of medicine and philosophy2016
Deconstructing the Brain Disconnection-Brain Death Analogy and Clarifying the Rationale for the Neurological Criterion of Death.
Article in The Journal of medicine and philosophy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- When does life end? Consensus and controversy in defining death.Monash bioethics review · 2026Article
- A structured analysis of the concept of brain death.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2026Article
- The Brain as a Whole? Neuroendocrine Functions and Death by Neurological Criteria.The Linacre quarterly · 2025Article
- Human Brain Organoid Research and Applications: Where and How to Meet Legal Challenges?Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2024Review
- Apoptosis in Postmortal Tissues of Goat Spinal Cords and Survival of Resident Neural Progenitors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Death as the extinction of the source of value: the constructivist theory of death as an irreversible loss of moral status.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2024Article
- Death as the Cessation of an Organism and the Moral Status Alternative.The Journal of medicine and philosophy · 2023Article
- Rethinking Brain Death-Why "Dead Enough" Is Not Good Enough: The UDDA Revision Series.Neurology · 2023Article
- The Moral Illicitness of Relying Solely on Neurological Criteria for the Determination of Death: A Catholic Response to "Brain Death".The Linacre quarterly · 2023Article
- How many ways can you die? Multiple biological deaths as a consequence of the multiple concepts of an organism.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2022Article
- (Re)-Emerging Challenges in Christian Bioethics: Leading Voices in Christian Bioethics.Christian bioethics · 2022Article
- Diagnosing death: the "fuzzy area" between life and decomposition.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2021Article
- Refinements in the Organism as a Whole Rationale for Brain Death.The Linacre quarterly · 2019Article
- Humility before New Scientific Evidence: We No Longer Have Moral Certainty that "Brain Death" Is True Death.The Linacre quarterly · 2019Article
- Brain Death and the Formation of Moral Conscience.The Linacre quarterly · 2019Article
- Why psychological accounts of personal identity can accept a brain death criterion and biological definition of death.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2019Article
- Whole-brain death and integration: realigning the ontological concept with clinical diagnostic tests.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2019Article
- The human organism is not a conductorless orchestra: a defense of brain death as true biological death.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2019Article
- When are you dead enough to be a donor? Can any feasible protocol for the determination of death on circulatory criteria respect the dead donor rule?Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2019Article
- Reply: Conscientious objection to deceased organ donation by healthcare professionals.Journal of the Intensive Care Society · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This article explains the problems with Alan Shewmon's critique of brain death as a valid sign of human death, beginning with a critical examination of his analogy between brain death and severe spinal cord injury. The article then goes on to assess his broader argument against the necessity of the brain for adult human organismal integration, arguing that he fails to translate correctly from biological to metaphysical claims. Finally, on the basis of a deeper metaphysical analysis, I offer a revised rationale for the validity of the neurological criterion of human death.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.