Trial reportBMC health services research2016
The value of informal care in the context of option B+ in Malawi: a contingent valuation approach.
Trial report in BMC health services research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT02005835 (Improving Uptake and Retention in PMTCT Services Through Novel Approaches in Family Supported Care and in Community Peer Outreach Support in Malawi), which is not on this map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Uptake and Retention in PMTCT Services Through Novel Approaches in Family Supported Care and in Community Peer Outreach Support in Malawi
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 23 citations in OpenAlex.
- A systematic review of the willingness-to-accept and willingness-to-pay disparities in empirical studies in the healthcare field.Archives of public health = Archives belges de sante publique · 2025Pooled it
- Pooled it
- Valuing Healthcare Goods and Services: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the WTA-WTP Disparity.PharmacoEconomics · 2020Pooled it
- Exploring the experience of informal caregivers of dependent elderly people with the well-being valuation method.Frontiers in psychiatry · 2025Article
- Monetary valuation of COVID-19 informal care: caregivers' willingness to pay and willingness to accept.Cost effectiveness and resource allocation : C/E · 2023Article
- Article
- The Challenges of Measuring Informal Care Time: A Review of the Literature.PharmacoEconomics · 2021Review
- Quantifying Family Spillover Effects in Economic Evaluations: Measurement and Valuation of Informal Care Time.PharmacoEconomics · 2019Review
- The role of community volunteers in PMTCT programme: Lessons from selected sites in Zambia to strengthen health education on infant feeding and follow-up of HIV-positive mother-infant pair.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2018Article
- Erratum to: The value of informal care in the context of option B+ in Malawi: a contingent valuation approach.BMC health services research · 2017Article
- Measuring and Valuing Informal Care for Economic Evaluation of HIV/AIDS Interventions: Methods and Application in Malawi.Value in health regional issues · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundInformal care, the health care provided by the patient's social network is important in low income settings although its monetary value is rarely estimated. The lack of estimates of the value of informal care has led to its omission in economic evaluations but this can result in incorrect decisions about cost effectiveness of an intervention. We explore the use of contingent valuation methods of willingness to pay (WTP) and willingness to accept (WTA) to estimate the value of informal care provided to HIV infected women that are accessing antiretroviral therapy (ART) under the Option B+ approach to prevention of mother-to-child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV in Malawi.
methodsWe collected cross sectional data from 93 caregivers of women that received ART care from six health facilities in Malawi. Caregivers of women that reported for ART care on the survey day and consented to participate in the survey were included until the targeted sample size for the facility was reached. We estimated the value of informal care by using the willingness to accept (WTA) and willingness to pay (WTP) approaches. Medians were used to summarize the values and these were compared by the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
resultsThe median WTA to provide informal care in a month was US$30 and the median WTP for informal care was US$13 and the two were statistically different (p < 0.000). Median WTP was higher in the urban areas than in the rural areas (US$21 vs. US$13, p < 0.001) and for caregivers from households from higher wealth quintile than in the lower quintile (US$15 vs. US$13, p < 0.0462).
conclusionInformal caregivers place substantial value on informal care giving. In low income settings where most caregivers are not formally employed, WTP and WTA approaches can be used to value informal care. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: NCT02005835.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.