Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27095110›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of clinical oncology2016

Feasibility of laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis and total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis for familial adenomatous polyposis: results of a nationwide multicenter study.

Tsuyoshi Konishi, Hideyuki Ishida, Hideki Ueno, Hirotoshi Kobayashi, Takao Hinoi, Yasuhiro Inoue, Fumio Ishida, Yukihide Kanemitsu, Tatsuro Yamaguchi, Naohiro Tomita and 3 more

Abstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of clinical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Management of desmoid tumors associated with familial adenomatous polyposis: a three-decade experience of a tertiary center in Brazil.Arquivos brasileiros de cirurgia digestiva : ABCD = Brazilian archives of digestive surgery · 2025
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Update on Surgical Management of FAP.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2023
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 11 institutions in 1 country.

Tsuyoshi KonishiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Gastroenterological Center, Cancer Institute Hospital, Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research, 3-8-31 Ariake, Koto-ku, Tokyo, 135-8550, Japan. tkonishi-tky@umin.ac.jp.
Hideyuki IshidaStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.
Hideki UenoStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.
Hirotoshi KobayashiStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.
Takao HinoiStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.
Yasuhiro InoueStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.
Fumio IshidaStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.
Yukihide KanemitsuStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.
Tatsuro YamaguchiStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.
Naohiro TomitaStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.
Nagahide MatsubaraStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.
Toshiaki WatanabeStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.
Kenichi SugiharaStudy Group for Familial Adenomatous Polyposis in the Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum, Tokyo, Japan.
Hyogo Medical University · JPTokyo Medical and Dental University · JPHiroshima University · JPJapanese Foundation For Cancer Research · JPMie University · JPNational Defense Medical College · JPShowa University Northern Yokohama Hospital · JPSocial Insurance Saitama Chuo Hospital · JPThe University of Tokyo · JPTokyo Metropolitan Komagome Hospital · JPTokyo National Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundData supporting the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic total proctocolectomy with ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (TPC-IPAA) and total colectomy with ileorectal anastomosis (TC-IRA) for patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) are limited. The aim of this study was to clarify the feasibility and morbidity of laparoscopic TPC-IPAA and TC-IRA for patients with FAP, using a large Japanese multicenter dataset.

methodsData on 256 patients with FAP who underwent TPC-IPAA (n = 171) or TC-IRA (n = 85) at 23 institutions between the years 2000 and 2012 were collected. Short- and long-term clinical outcomes were compared between laparoscopic and open approaches for each procedure.

resultsAmong the 256 patients with FAP, a total of 126 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery, consisting of 74 laparoscopic TPC-IPAAs and 52 laparoscopic TC-IRAs. The proportion of the FAP patients who underwent laparoscopic surgery increased during the study period, reaching 79 % of all TPC-IPAAs and 82 % of all TC-IRAs in the final two years covered by the data. In both TPC-IPAA and TC-IRA, the laparoscopic approach was associated with a longer operative duration but a similarly low postoperative morbidity and comparably adequate anal function compared with the open approach. The overall survival and the incidence of desmoid tumor were also comparable between the laparoscopic and open approaches in both procedures.

conclusionsLaparoscopic TPC-IPAA and TC-IRA are both feasible options-with low rates of morbidity, good functional outcomes, and excellent overall survival rates-in patients with FAP. Since the data indicate that laparoscopic TPC-IPAA and TC-IRA are feasible, they also support the recent increase in laparoscopic surgery for patients with FAP in Japan.

Indexed as

LaparoscopyAdenomatous Polyposis ColiAdolescentAdultAgedAnastomosis, SurgicalChildColectomyColonic PouchesDesmoid TumorsFeasibility StudiesFemaleHumansIleumIncidenceJapanFamilial adenomatous polyposisIleal pouch–anal anastomosisIleorectal anastomosisLaparoscopic surgeryTotal colectomyTotal proctocolectomy

Identifiers

PMID27095110
OpenAlexW2339055120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.