Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27094763›Full record

ArticleHernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery2016

Location of recurrent groin hernias at TEP after Lichtenstein repair: a study based on the Swedish Hernia Register.

S Bringman, H Holmberg, J Österberg

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

S BringmanDepartment of Surgery, Södertälje Hospital, SE-15286, Södertälje, Sweden. sven.bringman@ki.se.
H HolmbergDepartment of Statistics, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden.
J ÖsterbergDepartment of Surgery, Mora Hospital, Mora, Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo investigate which type of hernia that has the highest risk of a recurrence after a primary Lichtenstein repair.

methodsMale patients operated on with a Lichtenstein repair for a primary direct or indirect inguinal hernia and with a TEP for a later recurrence, with both operations recorded in the Swedish Hernia Register (SHR), were included in the study. The study period was 1994-2014.

resultsUnder the study period, 130,037 male patients with a primary indirect or direct inguinal hernia were operated on with a Lichtenstein repair. A second operation in the SHR was registered in 2236 of these patients (reoperation rate 1.7 %). TEP was the chosen operation in 737 in this latter cohort. The most likely location for a recurrence was the same as the primary location. If the recurrences change location from the primary place, we recognized that direct hernias had a RR of 1.51 to having a recurrent indirect hernia compared to having a direct recurrence after an indirect primary hernia repair.

conclusionsRecurrent hernias after Lichtenstein are more common on the same location as the primary one, compared to changing the location.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overGroinHernia, InguinalHerniorrhaphyHumansMaleMiddle AgedRecurrenceRegistriesReoperationSwedenYoung AdultLichtensteinRecurrencesSwedish Hernia RegisterTEP

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.