Trial reportContemporary clinical trials2016
Examining the efficacy of d-cycloserine to augment therapeutic learning in depression.
Trial report in Contemporary clinical trials, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02376257 (Improving Therapeutic Learning in Depression), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Improving Therapeutic Learning in Depression: Proof of Concept
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.
- Memory performance predicts response to psychotherapy for depression in bipolar disorder: A pilot randomized controlled trial with exploratory functional magnetic resonance imaging.Journal of affective disorders · 2018Trial
- Research Progress on NMDA Receptor Enhancement Drugs for the Treatment of Depressive Disorder.CNS drugs · 2024Review
- D-Cycloserine enhances the bidirectional range of NMDAR-dependent hippocampal synaptic plasticity.Translational psychiatry · 2024Article
- Leveraging Neuroplasticity to Enhance Adaptive Learning: The Potential for Synergistic Somatic-Behavioral Treatment Combinations to Improve Clinical Outcomes in Depression.Biological psychiatry · 2019Review
- Memory creation and modification: Enhancing the treatment of psychological disorders.The American psychologist · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Despite advances in individual and combined treatments for major depression, issues with non-response and partial-response remain relatively common, motivating the search for new treatment strategies. This study aims to develop one such novel treatment. In this proof-of-concept study, we are investigating whether the treatment enhancing effects of d-cycloserine (DCS) administration can be extended outside the extinction-learning paradigms where they have been primarily examined. Using uniform delivery of cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) content via computer-administered interventions for depression, we are assessing the value of pre-session administrations of DCS for retention of therapeutic learning. Recall of this information is evaluated in conjunction with performance on standardized tests of memory recall with both emotional and non-emotional stimuli. Specifically, in a randomized, double-blind trial we will compare the benefits of two pre-session administrations of DCS augmentation to those achieved by similar administrations of modafinil or placebo. Because modafinil is associated with a number of discriminable effects in addition to cognitive enhancement (e.g., feelings of vigor, alertness, positive mood); whereas these effects would not be expected with DCS, we will assess drug context effects in relation to memory augmentation effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.