Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27094563›Full record

SynthesisWorld journal of surgery2016

Outcomes of Parathyroidectomy in Patients with Primary Hyperparathyroidism: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Naykky M Singh Ospina, Rene Rodriguez-Gutierrez, Spyridoula Maraka, Ana E Espinosa de Ycaza, Sina Jasim, Ana Castaneda-Guarderas, Michael R Gionfriddo, Alaa Al Nofal, Juan P Brito, Patricia Erwin and 3 more

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in World journal of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
7.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 128 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Parathyroidectomy for adults with primary hyperparathyroidism.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2023
    Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Additional value of integratedEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2019
    Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Bone Mineral Density and First Line Imaging with [Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Naykky M Singh OspinaDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Rene Rodriguez-GutierrezKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit in Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Spyridoula MarakaDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Ana E Espinosa de YcazaDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Sina JasimDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Ana Castaneda-GuarderasKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit in Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Michael R GionfriddoKnowledge and Evaluation Research Unit in Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Alaa Al NofalDivision of Pediatric Endocrinology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Juan P BritoDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Patricia ErwinMayo Medical Library, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Melanie RichardsDivision of Endocrine Surgery, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Robert WermersDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA.
Victor M MontoriDivision of Endocrinology, Diabetes, Metabolism and Nutrition, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA. montori.victor@mayo.edu.
Mayo Clinic · USMayo Clinic in Arizona · USMayo Clinic in Florida · US

Funding

Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesUL1TR000135 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$41.2M
Mayo Clinic Center for Translational Science ActivitiesTL1TR000137 · NCATS · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI KHOSLA, SUNDEEP · 2012 to 2015
$2.1M
NCATS NIH HHS TL1 TR000137NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000135
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParathyroidectomy is a definitive treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism. Patients contemplating this intervention will benefit from knowledge regarding the expected outcomes and potential risks of the currently available surgical options. PURPOSE: To appraise and summarize the available evidence regarding benefits and harms of minimally invasive parathyroidectomy (MIP) and bilateral neck exploration (BNE). DATA SOURCES: A comprehensive search of multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus) from each database's inception to September 2014 was performed. STUDY SELECTION: Eligible studies evaluated patients with primary hyperparathyroidism undergoing MIP or BNE. DATA EXTRACTION: Reviewers working independently and in duplicate extracted data and assessed the risk of bias. DATA SYNTHESIS: We identified 82 observational studies and 6 randomized trials at moderate risk of bias. Most of them reported outcomes after MIP (n = 71). Using random-effects models to pool results across studies, the cure rate was 98 % (95 % CI 97-98 %, I (2) = 10 %) with BNE and 97 % (95 % CI 96-98 %, I (2) = 86 %) with MIP. Hypocalcemia occurred in 14 % (95 % CI 10-17 % I (2) = 93 %) of the BNE cases and in 2.3 % (95 % CI 1.6-3.1 %, I (2) = 87 %) with MIP (P < 0.001). There was a statistically significant lower risk of laryngeal nerve injury with MIP (0.3 %) than with BNE (0.9 %), but similar risk of infection (0.5 vs. 0.5 %) and mortality (0.1 vs. 0.5 %). LIMITATIONS: The available evidence, mostly observational, is at moderate risk of bias, and limited by indirect comparisons and inconsistency for some outcomes (cure rate, hypocalcemia).

conclusionMIP and BNE are both effective surgical techniques for the treatment of primary hyperparathyroidism. The safety profile of MIP appears superior to BNE (lower rate of hypocalcemia and recurrent laryngeal nerve injury).

Indexed as

HumansHyperparathyroidism, PrimaryHypocalcemiaMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresParathyroidectomyRecurrent Laryngeal Nerve Injuries

Identifiers

PMID27094563
OpenAlexW2340013772

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.