Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27094516›Full record

ArticleBMC genetics2016

SNP- and haplotype-based genome-wide association studies for growth, carcass, and meat quality traits in a Duroc multigenerational population.

Shuji Sato, Yoshinobu Uemoto, Takashi Kikuchi, Sachiko Egawa, Kimiko Kohira, Tomomi Saito, Hironori Sakuma, Satoshi Miyashita, Shinji Arata, Takatoshi Kojima and 1 more

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
27citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

27 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Shuji SatoNational Livestock Breeding Center, Nishigo, Fukushima, 961-8511, Japan. s0sato@nlbc.go.jp.
Yoshinobu UemotoNational Livestock Breeding Center, Nishigo, Fukushima, 961-8511, Japan.
Takashi KikuchiNational Livestock Breeding Center, Nishigo, Fukushima, 961-8511, Japan.
Sachiko EgawaMiyazaki Branch of National Livestock Breeding Center, Kobayashi, Miyazaki, 886-0004, Japan.
Kimiko KohiraNational Livestock Breeding Center, Nishigo, Fukushima, 961-8511, Japan.
Tomomi SaitoNational Livestock Breeding Center, Nishigo, Fukushima, 961-8511, Japan.
Hironori SakumaNational Livestock Breeding Center, Nishigo, Fukushima, 961-8511, Japan.
Satoshi MiyashitaMiyazaki Branch of National Livestock Breeding Center, Kobayashi, Miyazaki, 886-0004, Japan.
Shinji ArataMiyazaki Branch of National Livestock Breeding Center, Kobayashi, Miyazaki, 886-0004, Japan.
Takatoshi KojimaNational Livestock Breeding Center, Nishigo, Fukushima, 961-8511, Japan.
Keiichi SuzukiGraduate School of Agricultural Science, Tohoku University, Sendai, Miyagi, 981-8555, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe aim of the present study was to compare the power of single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based genome-wide association study (GWAS) and haplotype-based GWAS for quantitative trait loci (QTL) detection, and to detect novel candidate genes affecting economically important traits in a purebred Duroc population comprising seven-generation pedigree. First, we performed a simulation analysis using real genotype data of this population to compare the power (based on the null hypothesis) of the two methods. We then performed GWAS using both methods and real phenotype data comprising 52 traits, which included growth, carcass, and meat quality traits.

resultsIn total, 836 animals were genotyped using the Illumina PorcineSNP60 BeadChip and 14 customized SNPs from regions of known candidate genes related to the traits of interest. The power of SNP-based GWAS was greater than that of haplotype-based GWAS in a simulation analysis. In real data analysis, a larger number of significant regions was obtained by SNP-based GWAS than by haplotype-based GWAS. For SNP-based GWAS, 23 genome-wide significant SNP regions were detected for 17 traits, and 120 genome-wide suggestive SNP regions were detected for 27 traits. For haplotype-based GWAS, 6 genome-wide significant SNP regions were detected for four traits, and 11 genome-wide suggestive SNP regions were detected for eight traits. All genome-wide significant SNP regions detected by haplotype-based GWAS were located in regions also detected by SNP-based GWAS. Four regions detected by SNP-based GWAS were significantly associated with multiple traits: on Sus scrofa chromosome (SSC) 1 at 304 Mb; and on SSC7 at 35-39 Mb, 41-42 Mb, and 103 Mb. The vertnin gene (VRTN) in particular, was located on SSC7 at 103 Mb and was significantly associated with vertebrae number and carcass lengths. Mapped QTL regions contain some candidate genes involved in skeletal formation (FUBP3; far upstream element binding protein 3) and fat deposition (METTL3; methyltransferase like 3).

conclusionOur results show that a multigenerational pig population is useful for detecting QTL, which are typically segregated in a purebred population. In addition, a novel significant region could be detected by SNP-based GWAS as opposed to haplotype-based GWAS.

Indexed as

HaplotypesPolymorphism, Single NucleotideRed MeatAnimalsComputer SimulationDatabases, GeneticDNA-Binding ProteinsFemaleGenetic Association StudiesGenotyping TechniquesMaleMethyltransferasesQuantitative Trait LociSwineTranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsMethyltransferasesTranscription FactorsDuroc pigsHaplotype-based GWASKnown candidate genesProduction traitsSNP-based GWAS

Identifiers

PMID27094516
PMCPMC4837538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.