Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27094489›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2016

Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) analysis for continuous, binary, and count outcomes.

Wai-Ki Yip, Marco Bonetti, Bernard F Cole, William Barcella, Xin Victoria Wang, Ann Lazar, Richard D Gelber

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
12.6field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Differential effects of an electronic symptom monitoring intervention based on the age of patients with advanced cancer.Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology · 2020
    Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Journal of thoracic disease · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Wai-Ki YipDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA Department of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA wyip@jimmy.harvard.edu.
Marco BonettiCarlo F. Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public Policy, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy.
Bernard F ColeDepartment of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
William BarcellaDepartment of Statistical Science, University College London, London, UK.
Xin Victoria WangDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA Department of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Ann LazarDivision of Oral Epidemiology, Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences and Division of Biostatistics, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California-San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Richard D GelberDepartment of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA Department of Biostatistics, Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · USBocconi University · ITHarvard University · USUniversity College London · GBUniversity of California, San Francisco · USUniversity of Vermont · US

Funding

Genetic Epidemiology of COPDU01HL089897 · NHLBI · NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH · PI CRAPO, JAMES D · 2007 to 2021
$56.9M
Metabolomic signatures of empysema and COPD progression in the COPDGene cohortR01HL089897 · NHLBI · NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH · PI CRAPO, JAMES D · 2012 to 2016
$31.1M
Genetic Epidemiology of COPDU01HL089856 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SILVERMAN, EDWIN K · 2007 to 2021
$20.7M
(2 of 2) Genetic Epidemiology of COPDR01HL089856 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI SILVERMAN, EDWIN K · 2012 to 2016
$18.9M
SYSTEMS APPROACHES TO THE EPIDEMIOLOGY, GENETICS AND GENOMICS OF LUNG DISEASEST32HL007427 · NHLBI · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI DAWN L DEMEO, Edwin K Silverman · 1985 to 2026
$13.6M
IBCSG STATISTICAL CENTER--A BREAST CANCER STUDY RESOURCEU24CA075362 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE · PI REGAN, MEREDITH M · 1997 to 2015
$7.5M
New Faculty Development for Research to Reduce Oral Health DisparitiesP30DE020752 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, SAN FRANCISCO · PI GANSKY, STUART A · 2009 to 2010
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS U24 CA075362NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089856NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL089897NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL007427NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL089856NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL089897NIDCR NIH HHS P30 DE020752
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFor the past few decades, randomized clinical trials have provided evidence for effective treatments by comparing several competing therapies. Their successes have led to numerous new therapies to combat many diseases. However, since their conclusions are based on the entire cohort in the trial, the treatment recommendation is for everyone, and may not be the best option for an individual. Medical research is now focusing more on providing personalized care for patients, which requires investigating how patient characteristics, including novel biomarkers, modify the effect of current treatment modalities. This is known as heterogeneity of treatment effects. A better understanding of the interaction between treatment and patient-specific prognostic factors will enable practitioners to expand the availability of tailored therapies, with the ultimate goal of improving patient outcomes. The Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) approach was developed to allow researchers to investigate the heterogeneity of treatment effects on survival outcomes across values of a (continuously measured) covariate, such as a biomarker measurement.

methodsHere, we extend the Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot approach to continuous, binary, and count outcomes, which can be easily modeled using generalized linear models. With this extension of Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot, these additional types of treatment effects within subpopulations defined with respect to a covariate of interest can be estimated, and the statistical significance of any observed heterogeneity of treatment effect can be assessed using permutation tests. The desirable feature that commonly used models are applied to well-defined patient subgroups to estimate treatment effects is retained in this extension.

resultsWe describe a simulation study to confirm that the proper Type I error rate is maintained when there is no treatment heterogeneity, and a power study to show that the statistics have power to detect treatment heterogeneity under alternative scenarios. As an illustration, we apply the methods to data from the Aspirin/Folate Polyp Prevention Study, a clinical trial evaluating the effect of oral aspirin, folic acid, or both as a chemoprevention agent against colorectal adenomas. The pre-existing R software package stepp has been extended to handle continuous, binary, and count data using Gaussian, Bernoulli, and Poisson models, and it is available on the Comprehensive R Archive Network.

conclusionThe extension of the method and the availability of new software now permit STEPP to be applied to the full range of clinical trial end points.

Indexed as

AdenomaAspirinBiomarkers, TumorColorectal NeoplasmsData Interpretation, StatisticalFolic AcidHumansModels, StatisticalRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRiskSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeAspirinBiomarkers, TumorFolic AcidGeneralized linear modelrandomized clinical trialsubgroup analysisSubpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP)

Identifiers

PMID27094489
PMCPMC4942365
OpenAlexW2338261571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.