Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27094390›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgical oncology2016

Sentinel node biopsy during thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy for advanced esophageal cancer.

Judith Boone, Monique G G Hobbelink, Marguerite E I Schipper, Frank P Vleggaar, Inne H M Borel Rinkes, Robbert J de Haas, Jelle P Ruurda, Richard van Hillegersberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgical oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Sentinel node navigation surgery in esophageal cancer.Annals of gastroenterological surgery · 2019
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Identification of the Lymphatic Drainage Pattern of Esophageal Cancer with Near-Infrared Fluorescent Imaging.Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Judith BooneDepartment of Surgery (G04.228), University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Monique G G HobbelinkDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Marguerite E I SchipperDepartment of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Frank P VleggaarDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Inne H M Borel RinkesDepartment of Surgery (G04.228), University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Robbert J de HaasDepartment of Surgery (G04.228), University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Jelle P RuurdaDepartment of Surgery (G04.228), University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Richard van HillegersbergDepartment of Surgery (G04.228), University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. r.vanhillegersberg@umcutrecht.nl.
University Medical Center Utrecht · NLUtrecht University · NLHeidelberg University · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOmitting extensive lymph node dissection could reduce esophagectomy morbidity in patients without lymph node metastases. Sentinel node biopsy may identify abdominal or thoracic lymph node metastases, thereby differentiating treatment. Feasibility of this approach was investigated in Western European esophageal cancer patients with advanced disease, without lymph node metastases at diagnostic work-up.

methodsThe sentinel node biopsy was performed in eight esophageal cancer patients with cT1-3N0 disease. One day pre-operatively, Tc-99m-labeled nanocolloid was endoscopically injected around the tumor. Lymphoscintigraphy was performed 1 and 3 h after injection. All patients underwent robotic thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy with two-field lymph node dissection. Intraoperatively, sentinel nodes were detected by gamma probe. The resection specimen was analyzed for remaining activity by scintigraphy and gamma probe.

resultsVisualization rates of lymphoscintigraphy 1 and 3 h after tracer injection were 88 and 100%, respectively. Intraoperative identification rate was 38%. Postoperative identification was possible in all patients using the gamma probe to analyze the resection specimen. In 5/8 patients, lymph node metastases were found at histopathology, none of which was detected by the sentinel node biopsy. No adverse events related to the sentinel node biopsy were observed.

conclusionsIn our advanced esophageal cancer patients who underwent thoracolaparoscopic esophagectomy, the sentinel node biopsy did not predict lymph node status. Probably the real sentinel node could not be identified due to localization adjacent to the primary tumor or bypassing due to metastatic tumor involvement. Therefore, we consider the sentinel node biopsy not feasible in advanced esophageal cancer.

Indexed as

AgedCarcinoma, Squamous CellEsophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLaparoscopyMaleMiddle AgedMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresNeoplasm StagingPrognosisSentinel Lymph Node BiopsyThoracoscopyEsophageal cancerLymphadenectomyLymphatic metastasisMinimally invasive surgerySentinel lymph node biopsy

Identifiers

PMID27094390
PMCPMC4837514
OpenAlexW2338177216

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.