ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2016
Comparison between MRI-based attenuation correction methods for brain PET in dementia patients.
Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Optimizing cutoffs for clinical interpretation of brain amyloid status using PET/MRI: a multisite study.Alzheimer's research & therapy · 2026Article
- Synergy in Neuroimaging: PET-CT and MRI Fusion for Enhanced Characterization of Brain Pathology.Cureus · 2024Article
- Real-time motion-enabling positron emission tomography of the brain of upright ambulatory humans.Communications medicine · 2024Article
- A review of PET attenuation correction methods for PET-MR.EJNMMI physics · 2023Review
- Attenuation correction using deep Learning and integrated UTE/multi-echo Dixon sequence: evaluation in amyloid and tau PET imaging.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2021Article
- Evaluation of a model-based attenuation correction method on whole-bodyRadiological physics and technology · 2021Article
- Article
- Quantitative and clinical impact of MRI-based attenuation correction methods in [EJNMMI research · 2019Article
- Impact of non-uniform attenuation correction in a dynamic [EJNMMI research · 2019Article
- No significant difference found in PET/MRI CBF values reconstructed with CT-atlas-based and ZTE MR attenuation correction.EJNMMI research · 2019Article
- Article
- From simultaneous to synergistic MR-PET brain imaging: A review of hybrid MR-PET imaging methodologies.Human brain mapping · 2018Review
- Accurate hybrid template-based and MR-based attenuation correction using UTE images for simultaneous PET/MR brain imaging applications.BMC medical imaging · 2018Article
- Advances in PET/MR instrumentation and image reconstruction.The British journal of radiology · 2018Review
- PET/MRI: a frontier in era of complementary hybrid imaging.European journal of hybrid imaging · 2018Review
- UsingEJNMMI physics · 2017Article
- Pypes: Workflows for Processing Multimodal Neuroimaging Data.Frontiers in neuroinformatics · 2017Article
- Magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative dementias.Functional neurologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe combination of Positron Emission Tomography (PET) with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in hybrid PET/MRI scanners offers a number of advantages in investigating brain structure and function. A critical step of PET data reconstruction is attenuation correction (AC). Accounting for bone in attenuation maps (μ-map) was shown to be important in brain PET studies. While there are a number of MRI-based AC methods, no systematic comparison between them has been performed so far. The aim of this work was to study the different performance obtained by some of the recent methods presented in the literature. To perform such a comparison, we focused on [
methodsFour novel methods were used to calculate μ-maps from MRI data of 15 patients with Alzheimer's dementia (AD). The methods cover two atlas-based methods, a segmentation method, and a hybrid template/segmentation method. Additionally, the Dixon-based and a UTE-based method, offered by a vendor, were included in the comparison. Performance was assessed at three levels: tissue identification accuracy in the μ-map, quantitative accuracy of reconstructed PET data in specific brain regions, and precision in diagnostic images at identifying hypometabolic areas.
resultsQuantitative regional errors of -20--10 % were obtained using the vendor's AC methods, whereas the novel methods produced errors in a margin of ±5 %. The obtained precision at identifying areas with abnormally low levels of glucose uptake, potentially regions affected by AD, were 62.9 and 79.5 % for the two vendor AC methods, the former ignoring bone and the latter including bone information. The precision increased to 87.5-93.3 % in average for the four new methods, exhibiting similar performances.
conclusionWe confirm that the AC methods based on the Dixon and UTE sequences provided by the vendor are inferior to alternative techniques. As a novel finding, there was no substantial difference between the recently proposed atlas-based, template-based and segmentation-based methods.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.