ReviewTrends in hearing2016
The Perception of Auditory Motion.
Review in Trends in hearing, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
49 citing papers in PubMed.
- Eye Tracking-Based Evaluation of Auditory Spatial Attention in a Virtual Auditory Environment: Protocol for Development of a New Approach and Preliminary Validation.JMIR research protocols · 2026Article
- Article
- Audiovisual estimation of Time-to-contact.Attention, perception & psychophysics · 2026Article
- Studying dynamic sound source localization in a virtual maze with EEG and psychophysics.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Continuous tracking of audiovisual motion.Journal of vision · 2025Article
- Contribution of displacement, duration, and velocity on auditory motion direction perception in macaque monkeys.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Examining auditory modulations on detecting and pooling visual global motion.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Head rotations follow those of a truncated Fick gimbal during an auditory-guided visual search task.Journal of neurophysiology · 2024Article
- Highly compromised auditory spatial perception in aided congenitally hearing-impaired and rapid improvement with tactile technology.iScience · 2024Article
- Localizing 3D motion through the fingertips: Following in the footsteps of elephants.iScience · 2024Article
- When sounds come alive: animacy in the auditory sense.Frontiers in psychology · 2024Review
- The perception of auditory motion in sighted and early blind individuals.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Article
- Doppler Frequency-Shift Information Processing in WOAdvanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023Article
- Do you hear what I see? How do early blind individuals experience object motion?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Review
- Head movement and its relation to hearing.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Review
- Dynamic spectral cues do not affect human sound localization during small head movements.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Selective auditory attention modulates cortical responses to sound location change for speech in quiet and in babble.PloS one · 2023Article
- The power of vision: calibration of auditory space after sight restoration from congenital cataracts.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2022Article
- Auditory motion as a cue for source segregation and selection in a "cocktail party" listening environment.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The growing availability of efficient and relatively inexpensive virtual auditory display technology has provided new research platforms to explore the perception of auditory motion. At the same time, deployment of these technologies in command and control as well as in entertainment roles is generating an increasing need to better understand the complex processes underlying auditory motion perception. This is a particularly challenging processing feat because it involves the rapid deconvolution of the relative change in the locations of sound sources produced by rotational and translations of the head in space (self-motion) to enable the perception of actual source motion. The fact that we perceive our auditory world to be stable despite almost continual movement of the head demonstrates the efficiency and effectiveness of this process. This review examines the acoustical basis of auditory motion perception and a wide range of psychophysical, electrophysiological, and cortical imaging studies that have probed the limits and possible mechanisms underlying this perception.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.