ArticleJournal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation2016
A novel accelerometry-based algorithm for the detection of step durations over short episodes of gait in healthy elderly.
Article in Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.
- Is the Assessment of 5 Meters of Gait with a Single Body-Fixed-Sensor Enough to Recognize Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease-Associated Gait?Annals of biomedical engineering · 2017Trial
- Validation of an Algorithmic Pipeline for Wrist-Worn Devices to Estimate Walking Speed in People with Multiple Long-Term Conditions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Real-World Wrist-Derived Digital Mobility Outcomes in People with Multiple Long-Term Conditions: A Comparison of Algorithms.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- A systematic review of real-world gait-related digital mobility outcomes in Parkinson's disease.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Validity and reliability of inertial measurement units on gait, static balance and functional mobility performance among community-dwelling older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis.EFORT open reviews · 2025Article
- Validity of Wearable Inertial Sensors for Gait Analysis: A Systematic Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Gait smoothness during high-demand motor walking tasks in older adults with mild cognitive impairment.PloS one · 2024Article
- Person-Specific Template Matching Using a Dynamic Time Warping Step-Count Algorithm for Multiple Walking Activities.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- A Single-Sensor Approach to Quantify Gait in Patients with Hereditary Spastic Paraplegia.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Design and validation of a multi-task, multi-context protocol for real-world gait simulation.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2022Article
- Accurate Step Count with Generalized and Personalized Deep Learning on Accelerometer Data.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Smart Eyeglasses: A Valid and Reliable Device to Assess Spatiotemporal Parameters during Gait.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Reliability of IMU-Based Gait Assessment in Clinical Stroke Rehabilitation.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Article
- Field based assessment of a tri-axial accelerometers validity to identify steps and reliability to quantify external load.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Article
- Predicting vertical ground reaction forces from 3D accelerometry using reservoir computers leads to accurate gait event detection.Frontiers in sports and active living · 2022Article
- Concurrent Validity, Test-Retest Reliability, and Sensitivity to Change of a Single Body-Fixed Sensor for Gait Analysis during Rollator-Assisted Walking in Acute Geriatric Patients.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- Non-Linear Template-Based Approach for the Study of Locomotion.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- A Roadmap to Inform Development, Validation and Approval of Digital Mobility Outcomes: The Mobilise-D Approach.Digital biomarkers · 2020Review
- A Personalized Approach to Improve Walking Detection in Real-Life Settings: Application to Children with Cerebral Palsy.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Observational
- Appropriate Mother Wavelets for Continuous Gait Event Detection Based on Time-Frequency Analysis for Hemiplegic and Healthy Individuals.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe assessment of short episodes of gait is clinically relevant and easily implemented, especially given limited space and time requirements. BFS (body-fixed-sensors) are small, lightweight and easy to wear sensors, which allow the assessment of gait at relative low cost and with low interference. Thus, the assessment with BFS of short episodes of gait, extracted from dailylife physical activity or measured in a standardised and supervised setting, may add value in the study of gait quality of the elderly. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a novel algorithm based on acceleration signals recorded at different human locations (lower back and heels) for the detection of step durations over short episodes of gait in healthy elderly subjects.
methodsTwenty healthy elderly subjects (73.7 ± 7.9 years old) walked twice a distance of 5 m, wearing a BFS on the lower back, and on the outside of each heel. Moreover, an optoelectronic three-dimensional (3D) motion tracking system was used to detect step durations. A novel algorithm is presented for the detection of step durations from low-back and heel acceleration signals separately. The accuracy of the algorithm was assessed by comparing absolute differences in step duration between the three methods: step detection from the optoelectronic 3D motion tracking system, step detection from the application of the novel algorithm to low-back accelerations, and step detection from the application of the novel algorithm to heel accelerations.
resultsThe proposed algorithm successfully detected all the steps, without false positives and without false negatives. Absolute average differences in step duration within trials and across subjects were calculated for each comparison, between low-back accelerations and the optoelectronic system were on average 22.4 ± 7.6 ms (4.0 ± 1.3 % of average step duration), between heel accelerations and the optoelectronic system were on average 20.7 ± 11.8 ms (3.7 ± 1.9 %), and between low-back accelerations and heel accelerations were on average 27.8 ± 15.1 ms (4.9 ± 2.5 % of average step duration).
conclusionsThis study showed that the presented novel algorithm detects step durations over short episodes of gait in healthy elderly subjects with acceptable accuracy from low-back and heel accelerations, which provides opportunities to extract a range of gait parameters from short episodes of gait.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.