Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27093646›Full record

ArticleRevista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia2016

Cysts within Otherwise Probably Benign Solid Breast Masses and the Risk of Malignancy.

Rodrigo Menezes Jales, Karla Galvão Araujo, Luis Otávio Zanata Sarian, Kátia Piton Serra, Helena Keppke, Juliana Francisco, Sophie Françoise Mauricette Derchain

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Revista brasileira de ginecologia e obstetricia : revista da Federacao Brasileira das Sociedades de Ginecologia e Obstetricia, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rodrigo Menezes JalesHospital da Mulher Prof. Dr. Jose Aristodemo Pinotti (Women's Hospital), CAISM - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Karla Galvão AraujoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the School of Medical Sciences, Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Luis Otávio Zanata SarianHospital da Mulher Prof. Dr. Jose Aristodemo Pinotti (Women's Hospital), CAISM - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Kátia Piton SerraBreast Imaging Extension Course of the School of Medical Sciences, Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Helena KeppkeBreast Imaging Extension Course of the School of Medical Sciences, Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Juliana FranciscoBreast Imaging Extension Course of the School of Medical Sciences, Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brazil.
Sophie Françoise Mauricette DerchainHospital da Mulher Prof. Dr. Jose Aristodemo Pinotti (Women's Hospital), CAISM - Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the School of Medical Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Campinas - Unicamp, Campinas, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective The objective of this study is to assess whether the largest cyst diameter is useful for BI-RADS ultrasonography classification of predominantly solid breast masses with an oval shape, circumscribed margins, and largest axis parallel to the skin, which, except for the cystic component, would be likely classified as benign. Methods This study received approval from the local institutional review board. From March 2009 to August 2014, we prospectively biopsied 170 breast masses from 164 women. We grouped the largest cyst and mass diameters according to histopathological diagnoses. We used Student's t-test, linear regression, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for statistical assessment. Results Histopathological examination revealed 143 (84%) benign and 27 (16%) malignant masses. The mean largest mass diameter was larger among malignant (mean ± standard deviation, 34.1 ± 16.6 mm) than benign masses (24.7 ± 16.7 mm) (P < 0.008). The mean largest cyst diameter was also larger among malignant (9.9 ± 7.1 mm) than benign masses (4.6 ± 3.6 mm) (P < 0.001). Agreement between measurements of the largest mass and cyst diameters was low (R(2) = 0.26). AUC for the largest cyst diameter (0.78) was similar to the AUC for the largest mass diameter (0.69) (p = 0.2). A largest cyst diameter < 3, ≥ 3 to < 11, and ≥ 11 mm had a positive predictive value of 0, 15, and 52%, respectively. Conclusion A largest cystic component < 3 mm identified within breast masses that show favorable characteristics may be considered clinically inconsequential in ultrasonography characterization. Conversely, masses with a largest cystic component ≥ 3 mm should be classified as BI-RADS-US category 4.

Indexed as

Ultrasonography, MammaryAdultAgedBreast CystBreast NeoplasmsCross-Sectional StudiesDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleHumansMiddle AgedProspective StudiesRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID27093646
PMCPMC10309359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.