Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27093577›Full record

ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2016

Chemical Reactivity Window Determines Prodrug Efficiency toward Glutathione Transferase Overexpressing Cancer Cells.

Marike W van Gisbergen, Marcus Cebula, Jie Zhang, Astrid Ottosson-Wadlund, Ludwig Dubois, Philippe Lambin, Kenneth D Tew, Danyelle M Townsend, Guido R M M Haenen, Marie-José Drittij-Reijnders and 8 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Unveiling the Role of GlutathioneACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Theranostic Fluorescent Probes.Chemical reviews · 2024
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Nanoparticulation of Prodrug into Medicines for Cancer Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Marike W van GisbergenInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Division of Biochemical Toxicology, Karolinska Institutet , SE 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Marcus CebulaInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Division of Biochemical Toxicology, Karolinska Institutet , SE 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Jie ZhangInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Division of Biochemical Toxicology, Karolinska Institutet , SE 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Astrid Ottosson-WadlundInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Division of Biochemical Toxicology, Karolinska Institutet , SE 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Ludwig DuboisDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MaastRO Lab), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center , Universiteitssingel 50/23, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Philippe LambinDepartment of Radiation Oncology (MaastRO Lab), GROW-School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center , Universiteitssingel 50/23, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Kenneth D TewDepartments of Cell and Molecular Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States.
Danyelle M TownsendDepartment of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina 29425, United States.
Guido R M M HaenenDepartment of Toxicology, NUTRIM-School for Nutrition, Toxicology, and Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center , Universiteitssingel 50/23, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Marie-José Drittij-ReijndersDepartment of Toxicology, NUTRIM-School for Nutrition, Toxicology, and Metabolism, Maastricht University Medical Center , Universiteitssingel 50/23, PO Box 616, 6200 MD Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Hisao SaneyoshiNano Medical Engineering Laboratory, Discovery Research Institute, RIKEN 2-1 , Hirosawa, Wako-Shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
Mika ArakiNano Medical Engineering Laboratory, Discovery Research Institute, RIKEN 2-1 , Hirosawa, Wako-Shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
Yuko ShishidoDepartment of Chemistry, Graduate School of Science, Nagoya University , Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya 464-8602, Japan.
Yoshihiro ItoNano Medical Engineering Laboratory, Discovery Research Institute, RIKEN 2-1 , Hirosawa, Wako-Shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
Elias S J ArnérDivision of Biochemistry, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet , SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Hiroshi AbeNano Medical Engineering Laboratory, Discovery Research Institute, RIKEN 2-1 , Hirosawa, Wako-Shi, Saitama 351-0198, Japan.
Ralf MorgensternInstitute of Environmental Medicine, Division of Biochemical Toxicology, Karolinska Institutet , SE 17177 Stockholm, Sweden.
Katarina JohanssonDivision of Biochemistry, Department of Medical Biochemistry and Biophysics, Karolinska Institutet , SE-171 77 Stockholm, Sweden.
Karolinska Institutet · SEMaastricht University · NLMedical University of South Carolina · USNagoya University · JPRIKEN · JPUniversity Medical Center · USMaastro Clinic · NLRIKEN Advanced Science Institute · JP

Funding

SOUTH CAROLINA COBRE IN OXIDANTS, REDOX BALANCE AND STRESS SIGNALINGP20GM103542 · NIGMS · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI TEW, KENNETH D. · 2012 to 2020
$20.2M
SOUTH CAROLINA COBRE IN OXIDANTS, REDOX BALANCE AND STRESS SIGNALINGP20RR024485 · NCRR · MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA · PI TEW, KENNETH D. · 2011 to 2011
$2.2M
Redox regulation in the hepatostatR21AG055022 · NIA · MONTANA STATE UNIVERSITY - BOZEMAN · PI ARNER, ELIAS S.J., NAGY, PETER · 2016 to 2017
$382k
NCRR NIH HHS P20 RR024485NIA NIH HHS R21 AG055022NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM103542
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Glutathione transferases (GSTs) are often overexpressed in tumors and frequently correlated to bad prognosis and resistance against a number of different anticancer drugs. To selectively target these cells and to overcome this resistance we previously have developed prodrugs that are derivatives of existing anticancer drugs (e.g., doxorubicin) incorporating a sulfonamide moiety. When cleaved by GSTs, the prodrug releases the cytostatic moiety predominantly in GST overexpressing cells, thus sparing normal cells with moderate enzyme levels. By modifying the sulfonamide it is possible to control the rate of drug release and specifically target different GSTs. Here we show that the newly synthesized compounds, 4-acetyl-2-nitro-benzenesulfonyl etoposide (ANS-etoposide) and 4-acetyl-2-nitro-benzenesulfonyl doxorubicin (ANS-DOX), function as prodrugs for GSTA1 and MGST1 overexpressing cell lines. ANS-DOX, in particular, showed a desirable cytotoxic profile by inducing toxicity and DNA damage in a GST-dependent manner compared to control cells. Its moderate conversion of 500 nmol/min/mg, as catalyzed by GSTA1, seems hereby essential since the more reactive 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonyl doxorubicin (DNS-DOX) (14000 nmol/min/mg) did not display a preference for GSTA1 overexpressing cells. DNS-DOX, however, effectively killed GSTP1 (20 nmol/min/mg) and MGST1 (450 nmol/min/mg) overexpressing cells as did the less reactive 4-mononitrobenzenesulfonyl doxorubicin (MNS-DOX) in a MGST1-dependent manner (1.5 nmol/min/mg) as shown previously. Furthermore, we show that the mechanism of these prodrugs involves a reduction in GSH levels as well as inhibition of the redox regulatory enzyme thioredoxin reductase 1 (TrxR1) by virtue of their electrophilic sulfonamide moiety. TrxR1 is upregulated in many tumors and associated with resistance to chemotherapy and poor patient prognosis. Additionally, the prodrugs potentially acted as a general shuttle system for DOX, by overcoming resistance mechanisms in cells. Here we propose that GST-dependent prodrugs require a conversion rate "window" in order to selectively target GST overexpressing cells, while limiting their effects on normal cells. Prodrugs are furthermore a suitable system to specifically target GSTs and to overcome various drug resistance mechanisms that apply to the parental drug.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic AgentsCell Line, TumorCytostatic AgentsDoxorubicinDrug Resistance, NeoplasmEtoposideGlutathioneGlutathione TransferaseHumansMCF-7 CellsProdrugsSulfonamidesUp-RegulationAntineoplastic AgentsCytostatic AgentsDoxorubicinEtoposideGlutathioneGlutathione TransferaseProdrugsSulfonamidesdoxorubicinetoposideglutathione transferasesGSTA1MGST1prodrugsredoxTrxR1

Identifiers

PMID27093577
PMCPMC5241094
OpenAlexW2339710189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.