ArticleMolecular pharmaceutics2016
Chemical Reactivity Window Determines Prodrug Efficiency toward Glutathione Transferase Overexpressing Cancer Cells.
Article in Molecular pharmaceutics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Unveiling the Role of GlutathioneACS pharmacology & translational science · 2026Review
- Dual-action mitochondria-targeted prodrugs that both deplete mitochondrial glutathione and deliver a toxic payload to the matrix.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2026Article
- Draw on advantages and avoid disadvantages: CT-derived individualized radiomic signature for predicting chemo-radiotherapy sensitivity in unresectable advanced non-small cell lung cancer.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2024Article
- Human mitochondrial glutathione transferases: Kinetic parameters and accommodation of a mitochondria-targeting group in substrates.Bioorganic & medicinal chemistry · 2024Article
- Theranostic Fluorescent Probes.Chemical reviews · 2024Review
- Advances in drug resistance of triple negative breast cancer caused by pregnane X receptor.World journal of clinical oncology · 2023Review
- Microsomal glutathione transferase 1 in cancer and the regulation of ferroptosis.Advances in cancer research · 2023Review
- IRE-1-Targeting Caged Prodrug with Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress-Inducing and XBP-1S-Inhibiting Activities for Cancer Therapy.Molecular pharmaceutics · 2022Article
- Revisiting therapeutic strategies for ovarian cancer by focusing on redox homeostasis.Oncology letters · 2022Review
- Nanoparticulation of Prodrug into Medicines for Cancer Therapy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2021Review
- DDRS: Detection of drug response SNPs specifically in patients receiving drug treatment.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2021Article
- Characterization of ROS Metabolic Equilibrium Reclassifies Pan-Cancer Samples and Guides Pathway Targeting Therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2020Article
- Glutathione Transferases: Potential Targets to Overcome Chemoresistance in Solid Tumors.International journal of molecular sciences · 2018Review
- Anticancer activity of 2'-hydroxyflavanone towards lung cancer.Oncotarget · 2018Article
- Redox control of cancer cell destruction.Redox biology · 2018Review
- Glutathione transferases: substrates, inihibitors and pro-drugs in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases.Oncogenesis · 2018Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
Abstract
Glutathione transferases (GSTs) are often overexpressed in tumors and frequently correlated to bad prognosis and resistance against a number of different anticancer drugs. To selectively target these cells and to overcome this resistance we previously have developed prodrugs that are derivatives of existing anticancer drugs (e.g., doxorubicin) incorporating a sulfonamide moiety. When cleaved by GSTs, the prodrug releases the cytostatic moiety predominantly in GST overexpressing cells, thus sparing normal cells with moderate enzyme levels. By modifying the sulfonamide it is possible to control the rate of drug release and specifically target different GSTs. Here we show that the newly synthesized compounds, 4-acetyl-2-nitro-benzenesulfonyl etoposide (ANS-etoposide) and 4-acetyl-2-nitro-benzenesulfonyl doxorubicin (ANS-DOX), function as prodrugs for GSTA1 and MGST1 overexpressing cell lines. ANS-DOX, in particular, showed a desirable cytotoxic profile by inducing toxicity and DNA damage in a GST-dependent manner compared to control cells. Its moderate conversion of 500 nmol/min/mg, as catalyzed by GSTA1, seems hereby essential since the more reactive 2,4-dinitrobenzenesulfonyl doxorubicin (DNS-DOX) (14000 nmol/min/mg) did not display a preference for GSTA1 overexpressing cells. DNS-DOX, however, effectively killed GSTP1 (20 nmol/min/mg) and MGST1 (450 nmol/min/mg) overexpressing cells as did the less reactive 4-mononitrobenzenesulfonyl doxorubicin (MNS-DOX) in a MGST1-dependent manner (1.5 nmol/min/mg) as shown previously. Furthermore, we show that the mechanism of these prodrugs involves a reduction in GSH levels as well as inhibition of the redox regulatory enzyme thioredoxin reductase 1 (TrxR1) by virtue of their electrophilic sulfonamide moiety. TrxR1 is upregulated in many tumors and associated with resistance to chemotherapy and poor patient prognosis. Additionally, the prodrugs potentially acted as a general shuttle system for DOX, by overcoming resistance mechanisms in cells. Here we propose that GST-dependent prodrugs require a conversion rate "window" in order to selectively target GST overexpressing cells, while limiting their effects on normal cells. Prodrugs are furthermore a suitable system to specifically target GSTs and to overcome various drug resistance mechanisms that apply to the parental drug.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.