Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27092179›Full record

ArticleComputational intelligence and neuroscience2016

MEG Connectivity and Power Detections with Minimum Norm Estimates Require Different Regularization Parameters.

Ana-Sofía Hincapié, Jan Kujala, Jérémie Mattout, Sebastien Daligault, Claude Delpuech, Domingo Mery, Diego Cosmelli, Karim Jerbi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ana-Sofía HincapiéPsychology Department, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada H2V 2S9; Department of Computer Science, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 7820436 Santiago de Chile, Chile; School of Psychology and Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 7820436 Santiago de Chile, Chile; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, DyCog Team, Inserm U1028, CNRS UMR5292, 69675 Bron Cedex, France.
Jan KujalaLyon Neuroscience Research Center, DyCog Team, Inserm U1028, CNRS UMR5292, 69675 Bron Cedex, France; Department of Neuroscience and Biomedical Engineering, Aalto University, 02150 Espoo, Finland.
Jérémie MattoutLyon Neuroscience Research Center, DyCog Team, Inserm U1028, CNRS UMR5292, 69675 Bron Cedex, France.
Sebastien DaligaultMEG Center, CERMEP, 69675 Bron Cedex, France.
Claude DelpuechMEG Center, CERMEP, 69675 Bron Cedex, France.
Domingo MeryDepartment of Computer Science, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 7820436 Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Diego CosmelliSchool of Psychology and Interdisciplinary Center for Neurosciences, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, 7820436 Santiago de Chile, Chile.
Karim JerbiPsychology Department, University of Montreal, Montreal, QC, Canada H2V 2S9; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, DyCog Team, Inserm U1028, CNRS UMR5292, 69675 Bron Cedex, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimum Norm Estimation (MNE) is an inverse solution method widely used to reconstruct the source time series that underlie magnetoencephalography (MEG) data. MNE addresses the ill-posed nature of MEG source estimation through regularization (e.g., Tikhonov regularization). Selecting the best regularization parameter is a critical step. Generally, once set, it is common practice to keep the same coefficient throughout a study. However, it is yet to be known whether the optimal lambda for spectral power analysis of MEG source data coincides with the optimal regularization for source-level oscillatory coupling analysis. We addressed this question via extensive Monte-Carlo simulations of MEG data, where we generated 21,600 configurations of pairs of coupled sources with varying sizes, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), and coupling strengths. Then, we searched for the Tikhonov regularization coefficients (lambda) that maximize detection performance for (a) power and (b) coherence. For coherence, the optimal lambda was two orders of magnitude smaller than the best lambda for power. Moreover, we found that the spatial extent of the interacting sources and SNR, but not the extent of coupling, were the main parameters affecting the best choice for lambda. Our findings suggest using less regularization when measuring oscillatory coupling compared to power estimation.

Indexed as

Signal Processing, Computer-AssistedAlgorithmsBrainBrain MappingComputer SimulationHumansMagnetoencephalographyMonte Carlo Method

Identifiers

PMID27092179
PMCPMC4820599

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.