Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27092173›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in genetics2016

Genome Engineering with TALE and CRISPR Systems in Neuroscience.

Han B Lee, Brynn N Sundberg, Ashley N Sigafoos, Karl J Clark

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Han B LeeNeurobiology of Disease Graduate Program, Mayo Graduate School Rochester, MN, USA.
Brynn N SundbergDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA.
Ashley N SigafoosDepartment of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN, USA.
Karl J ClarkNeurobiology of Disease Graduate Program, Mayo Graduate SchoolRochester, MN, USA; Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Mayo ClinicRochester, MN, USA.

Funding

PILOT AND FEASIBILTY PROGRAMP30DK084567 · NIDDK · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI Nicholas F. LaRusso · 2009 to 2026
$22.2M
Systematic Vertebrate Functional GenomicsR01GM063904 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN · PI EKKER, STEPHEN CARL · 2001 to 2025
$10.7M
NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK084567NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM063904
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent advancement in genome engineering technology is changing the landscape of biological research and providing neuroscientists with an opportunity to develop new methodologies to ask critical research questions. This advancement is highlighted by the increased use of programmable DNA-binding agents (PDBAs) such as transcription activator-like effector (TALE) and RNA-guided clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR)/CRISPR associated (Cas) systems. These PDBAs fused or co-expressed with various effector domains allow precise modification of genomic sequences and gene expression levels. These technologies mirror and extend beyond classic gene targeting methods contributing to the development of novel tools for basic and clinical neuroscience. In this Review, we discuss the recent development in genome engineering and potential applications of this technology in the field of neuroscience.

Indexed as

Cas9CRISPRgenome engineeringneuroscienceTALETALENZFN

Identifiers

PMID27092173
PMCPMC4821859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.