Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27092128›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in microbiology2016

Biocontrol and Rapid Detection of Food-Borne Pathogens Using Bacteriophages and Endolysins.

Jaewoo Bai, You-Tae Kim, Sangryeol Ryu, Ju-Hoon Lee

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
16.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 146 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Bacteriophages AgainstViruses · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Characterization ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Limitation of the Lytic Effect of Bacteriophages onInternational journal of microbiology · 2025
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Isolation and genomic characterization of SMicrobiology resource announcements · 2024
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Isolation and Characterization of aJournal of microbiology and biotechnology · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Physical Treatments to ControlFoods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Biofilm Formation by Pathogenic Bacteria: Applying aPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jaewoo BaiDepartment of Food and Animal Biotechnology, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University Seoul, South Korea.
You-Tae KimDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology and Institute of Life Science and Resources, Kyung Hee University Yongin, South Korea.
Sangryeol RyuDepartment of Food and Animal Biotechnology, Department of Agricultural Biotechnology, Center for Food and Bioconvergence, Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National UniversitySeoul, South Korea; Institute of Food Industrialization, Institutes of Green Bio Science and Technology, Seoul National UniversityPyeongchang, South Korea.
Ju-Hoon LeeDepartment of Food Science and Biotechnology and Institute of Life Science and Resources, Kyung Hee University Yongin, South Korea.
Kyung Hee University · KRSeoul National University · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriophages have been suggested as natural food preservatives as well as rapid detection materials for food-borne pathogens in various foods. Since Listeria monocytogenes-targeting phage cocktail (ListShield) was approved for applications in foods, numerous phages have been screened and experimentally characterized for phage applications in foods. A single phage and phage cocktail treatments to various foods contaminated with food-borne pathogens including E. coli O157:H7, Salmonella enterica, Campylobacter jejuni, Listeria monocytogenes, Staphylococcus aureus, Cronobacter sakazakii, and Vibrio spp. revealed that they have great potential to control various food-borne pathogens and may be alternative for conventional food preservatives. In addition, phage-derived endolysins with high host specificity and host lysis activities may be preferred to food applications rather than phages. For rapid detection of food-borne pathogens, cell-wall binding domains (CBDs) from endolysins have been suggested due to their high host-specific binding. Fluorescence-tagged CBDs have been successfully evaluated and suggested to be alternative materials of expensive antibodies for various detection applications. Most recently, reporter phage systems have been developed and tested to confirm their usability and accuracy for specific detection. These systems revealed some advantages like rapid detection of only viable pathogenic cells without interference by food components in a very short reaction time, suggesting that these systems may be suitable for monitoring of pathogens in foods. Consequently, phage is the next-generation biocontrol agent as well as rapid detection tool to confirm and even identify the food-borne pathogens present in various foods.

Indexed as

bacteriophagebiocontrolcell-wall binding domainendolysinfood-borne pathogensfood preservativesrapid detectionreporter phage

Identifiers

PMID27092128
PMCPMC4824769
OpenAlexW2318874474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.