Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27092107›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2016

A European Database of Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum Trichothecene Genotypes.

Matias Pasquali, Marco Beyer, Antonio Logrieco, Kris Audenaert, Virgilio Balmas, Ryan Basler, Anne-Laure Boutigny, Jana Chrpová, Elżbieta Czembor, Tatiana Gagkaeva and 22 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 64 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
64citing papers in PubMed
65.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

64 citing papers in PubMed, 196 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Analysis of Wheat Grain Infection bySensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  6. The Wheat EndophyteJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Toxins · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Containment ofJournal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Wheat Seed Coating withMicroorganisms · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

4 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

32 authors at 20 institutions in 15 countries.

Matias PasqualiDepartment of Environmental Research and Innovation, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Marco BeyerDepartment of Environmental Research and Innovation, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Antonio LogriecoInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council Bari, Italy.
Kris AudenaertDepartment of Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Ghent, Belgium.
Virgilio BalmasDepartment of Agriculture, University of Sassari Sassari, Italy.
Ryan BaslerBIOGER UMR, INRA Thiverval-Grignon, France.
Anne-Laure BoutignyANSES, Plant Health Laboratory Angers, France.
Jana ChrpováDivision of Crop Genetics and Breeding, Crop Research Institute Prague, Czech Republic.
Elżbieta CzemborDepartment of Grasses, Legumes and Energy Plants, Plant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute-National Research Institute Radzikow, Poland.
Tatiana GagkaevaLaboratory of Mycology and Phytopathology, All-Russian Institute of Plant Protection St. Petersburg, Russia.
María T González-JaénDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Biology, Complutense University of Madrid Madrid, Spain.
Ingerd S HofgaardNorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research Ås, Norway.
Nagehan D KöycüDepartment of Plant Protection, Agriculture Faculty, Namık Kemal University Tekirdag, Turkey.
Lucien HoffmannDepartment of Environmental Research and Innovation, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Jelena LevićLaboratory of Phytopathology and Entomology, Maize Research Institute Zemun Polje Belgrade, Serbia.
Patricia MarinDepartment of Genetics, Faculty of Biology, Complutense University of Madrid Madrid, Spain.
Thomas MiedanerPlant Breeding Institute, University of Hohenheim Stuttgart, Germany.
Quirico MigheliDepartment of Agriculture, University of Sassari Sassari, Italy.
Antonio MorettiInstitute of Sciences of Food Production, National Research Council Bari, Italy.
Marina E H MüllerLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research, Institute for Landscape Biogeochemistry Müncheberg, Germany.
Françoise MunautApplied Microbiology, Earth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Päivi ParikkaDepartment Natural Resources and Bioproduction, Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke) Jokioinen, Finland.
Marine Pallez-BarthelDepartment of Environmental Research and Innovation, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Jonathan PiecDepartment of Environmental Research and Innovation, Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology Belvaux, Luxembourg.
Jonathan ScauflaireApplied Microbiology, Earth and Life Institute, Université Catholique de Louvain Louvain-la-Neuve, Belgium.
Barbara SchermDepartment of Agriculture, University of Sassari Sassari, Italy.
Slavica StankovićLaboratory of Phytopathology and Entomology, Maize Research Institute Zemun Polje Belgrade, Serbia.
Ulf ThraneSection for Eukaryotic Biotechnology, DTU Systems Biology, Technical University of Denmark Kongens Lyngby, Denmark.
Silvio UhligSection for Chemistry and Toxicology, Norwegian Veterinary Institute Oslo, Norway.
Adriaan VanheuleDepartment of Applied Biosciences, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University Ghent, Belgium.
Tapani Yli-MattilaMolecular Plant Biology, Department of Biochemistry, University of Turku Turku, Finland.
Susanne VogelgsangResearch Division Grassland Sciences and Agro-Ecosystems, Institute for Sustainability Sciences, Agroscope Zürich, Switzerland.
Luxembourg Institute of Science and Technology · LUUniversity of Sassari · ITGhent University · BEMaize Research Institute Zemun Polje · RSUCLouvain · BEUniversidad Complutense de Madrid · ESAgence Nationale de Sécurité Sanitaire de l’Alimentation, de l’Environnement et du Travail · FRAgroscope · CHAll-Russian Institute of Plant Protection · RUBiologie et Gestion des Risques en Agriculture · FRCzech Agrifood Research Center · CZInstitute of Sciences of Food Production · ITLeibniz Centre for Agricultural Landscape Research · DENational Research Council · ITNatural Resources Institute Finland · FINorwegian Institute of Bioeconomy Research · NONorwegian Veterinary Institute · NOPlant Breeding and Acclimatization Institute - National Research Institute · PLTechnical University of Denmark · DKTekirdağ Namık Kemal University · TR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Fusarium species, particularly Fusarium graminearum and F. culmorum, are the main cause of trichothecene type B contamination in cereals. Data on the distribution of Fusarium trichothecene genotypes in cereals in Europe are scattered in time and space. Furthermore, a common core set of related variables (sampling method, host cultivar, previous crop, etc.) that would allow more effective analysis of factors influencing the spatial and temporal population distribution, is lacking. Consequently, based on the available data, it is difficult to identify factors influencing chemotype distribution and spread at the European level. Here we describe the results of a collaborative integrated work which aims (1) to characterize the trichothecene genotypes of strains from three Fusarium species, collected over the period 2000-2013 and (2) to enhance the standardization of epidemiological data collection. Information on host plant, country of origin, sampling location, year of sampling and previous crop of 1147 F. graminearum, 479 F. culmorum, and 3 F. cortaderiae strains obtained from 17 European countries was compiled and a map of trichothecene type B genotype distribution was plotted for each species. All information on the strains was collected in a freely accessible and updatable database (www.catalogueeu.luxmcc.lu), which will serve as a starting point for epidemiological analysis of potential spatial and temporal trichothecene genotype shifts in Europe. The analysis of the currently available European dataset showed that in F. graminearum, the predominant genotype was 15-acetyldeoxynivalenol (15-ADON) (82.9%), followed by 3-acetyldeoxynivalenol (3-ADON) (13.6%), and nivalenol (NIV) (3.5%). In F. culmorum, the prevalent genotype was 3-ADON (59.9%), while the NIV genotype accounted for the remaining 40.1%. Both, geographical and temporal patterns of trichothecene genotypes distribution were identified.

Indexed as

acetyldeoxynivalenolchemotypedatabaseFusariumgenotypemycotoxinnivalenoltrichothecene

Identifiers

PMID27092107
PMCPMC4821861
OpenAlexW2313496482

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.