ArticleFrontiers in psychology2016
Learning and Memory Processes Following Cochlear Implantation: The Missing Piece of the Puzzle.
Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
31 citing papers in PubMed.
- Executive functioning and nonverbal cognitive factors associated with response to technology-assisted language intervention.International journal of pediatric otorhinolaryngology · 2024Trial
- Noise-induced hearing loss delays auditory learning and reduces the influence of acoustic evidence on choice.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Do auditory brainstem implants favor the development of sensory integration and cognitive functions?Brain and behavior · 2024Article
- Multidisciplinary Cognitive Function Assessment of Good versus Poor Performance in Children with Cochlear Implants: An Observational Cross-Sectional Study.International archives of otorhinolaryngology · 2023Article
- Streamlining experiment design in cognitive hearing science using OpenSesame.Behavior research methods · 2023Article
- Exploring neurocognitive factors and brain activation in adult cochlear implant recipients associated with speech perception outcomes-A scoping review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Electrophysiological Examination of Ambient Speech Processing in Children With Cochlear Implants.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2022Article
- Visual statistical learning in deaf and hearing infants and toddlers.Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies · 2022Article
- Children's syntactic parsing and sentence comprehension with a degraded auditory signal.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America · 2022Article
- The Importance of Access to Bilateral Hearing through Cochlear Implants in Children.Seminars in hearing · 2021Review
- Cognitive functioning in Deaf children using Cochlear implants.BMC pediatrics · 2021Article
- Electrophysiological Dynamics of Visual-Tactile Temporal Order Perception in Early Deaf Adults.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Rethinking Emergent Literacy in Children With Hearing Loss.Frontiers in psychology · 2020Review
- The Effect of Side of Implantation on the Cortical Processing of Frequency Changes in Adult Cochlear Implant Users.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2020Article
- Visual sequential processing and language ability in children who are deaf or hard of hearing.Journal of child language · 2019Article
- Evaluating Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users' Encoding, Storage, and Retrieval Strategies in Verbal Working Memory.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019Article
- Verbal Learning and Memory in Early-Implanted, Prelingually Deaf Adolescent and Adult Cochlear Implant Users.Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR · 2019Article
- Early Cognitive Predictors of 9-Year-Old Spoken Language in Children With Mild to Severe Hearing Loss Using Hearing Aids.Frontiers in psychology · 2019Article
- The Promise-and Challenge-of Statistical Learning for Elucidating Atypical Language Development.Current directions in psychological science · 2018Article
- Language processing fluency and verbal working memory in prelingually deaf long-term cochlear implant users: A pilot study.Cochlear implants international · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
At the present time, there is no question that cochlear implants (CIs) work and often work very well in quiet listening conditions for many profoundly deaf children and adults. The speech and language outcomes data published over the last two decades document quite extensively the clinically significant benefits of CIs. Although there now is a large body of evidence supporting the "efficacy" of CIs as a medical intervention for profound hearing loss in both children and adults, there still remain a number of challenging unresolved clinical and theoretical issues that deal with the "effectiveness" of CIs in individual patients that have not yet been successfully resolved. In this paper, we review recent findings on learning and memory, two central topics in the field of cognition that have been seriously neglected in research on CIs. Our research findings on sequence learning, memory and organization processes, and retrieval strategies used in verbal learning and memory of categorized word lists suggests that basic domain-general learning abilities may be the missing piece of the puzzle in terms of understanding the cognitive factors that underlie the enormous individual differences and variability routinely observed in speech and language outcomes following cochlear implantation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.