Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27092062›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in systems neuroscience2016

Making Waves in the Brain: What Are Oscillations, and Why Modulating Them Makes Sense for Brain Injury.

Aleksandr Pevzner, Ali Izadi, Darrin J Lee, Kiarash Shahlaie, Gene G Gurkoff

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 42 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Neuronal Degeneration Impairs Rhythms Between Connected Microcircuits.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2020
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aleksandr PevznerDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA.
Ali IzadiDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA.
Darrin J LeeDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA.
Kiarash ShahlaieDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA.
Gene G GurkoffDepartment of Neurological Surgery, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA; Center for Neuroscience, University of California-DavisSacramento, CA, USA.
University of California, Davis · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

Restoring functional connectivity following TBIR01NS084026 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT DAVIS · PI GURKOFF, GENE GABRIEL · 2014 to 2018
$2.1M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS084026
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) can result in persistent cognitive, behavioral and emotional deficits. However, the vast majority of patients are not chronically hospitalized; rather they have to manage their disabilities once they are discharged to home. Promoting recovery to pre-injury level is important from a patient care as well as a societal perspective. Electrical neuromodulation is one approach that has shown promise in alleviating symptoms associated with neurological disorders such as in Parkinson's disease (PD) and epilepsy. Consistent with this perspective, both animal and clinical studies have revealed that TBI alters physiological oscillatory rhythms. More recently several studies demonstrated that low frequency stimulation improves cognitive outcome in models of TBI. Specifically, stimulation of the septohippocampal circuit in the theta frequency entrained oscillations and improved spatial learning following TBI. In order to evaluate the potential of electrical deep brain stimulation for clinical translation we review the basic neurophysiology of oscillations, their role in cognition and how they are changed post-TBI. Furthermore, we highlight several factors for future pre-clinical and clinical studies to consider, with the hope that it will promote a hypothesis driven approach to subsequent experimental designs and ultimately successful translation to improve outcome in patients with TBI.

Indexed as

deep brain stimulationelectrical neuromodulationhippocampusoscillationsthetatraumatic brain injury

Identifiers

PMID27092062
PMCPMC4823270
OpenAlexW2327028573

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.