Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27091982›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2016

Primary motor and sensory cortical areas communicate via spatiotemporally coordinated networks at multiple frequencies.

Fritzie I Arce-McShane, Callum F Ross, Kazutaka Takahashi, Barry J Sessle, Nicholas G Hatsopoulos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 65 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
65citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

65 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

5 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Fritzie I Arce-McShaneDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; fritziea@uchicago.edu nicho@uchicago.edu.
Callum F RossDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637;
Kazutaka TakahashiDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637;
Barry J SessleFaculty of Dentistry, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5G 1G6, Canada;
Nicholas G HatsopoulosDepartment of Organismal Biology and Anatomy, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; Committee on Computational Neuroscience, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637; Committee on Neurobiology, University of Chicago, Chicago, IL 60637 fritziea@uchicago.edu nicho@uchicago.edu.

Funding

Neuroplasticity and the role of sensorimotor cortex in control of orofacial functR01DE023816 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI ROSS, CALLUM F · 2014 to 2018
$2.6M
NIDCR NIH HHS R01 DE023816
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Skilled movements rely on sensory information to shape optimal motor responses, for which the sensory and motor cortical areas are critical. How these areas interact to mediate sensorimotor integration is largely unknown. Here, we measure intercortical coherence between the orofacial motor (MIo) and somatosensory (SIo) areas of cortex as monkeys learn to generate tongue-protrusive force. We report that coherence between MIo and SIo is reciprocal and that neuroplastic changes in coherence gradually emerge over a few days. These functional networks of coherent spiking and local field potentials exhibit frequency-specific spatiotemporal properties. During force generation, theta coherence (2-6 Hz) is prominent and exhibited by numerous paired signals; before or after force generation, coherence is evident in alpha (6-13 Hz), beta (15-30 Hz), and gamma (30-50 Hz) bands, but the functional networks are smaller and weaker. Unlike coherence in the higher frequency bands, the distribution of the phase at peak theta coherence is bimodal with peaks near 0° and ±180°, suggesting that communication between somatosensory and motor areas is coordinated temporally by the phase of theta coherence. Time-sensitive sensorimotor integration and plasticity may rely on coherence of local and large-scale functional networks for cortical processes to operate at multiple temporal and spatial scales.

Indexed as

Action PotentialsAnimalsCortical SynchronizationFeedback, SensoryMacaca mulattaMaleMotor CortexMovementNerve NetNeural PathwaysNeuronal PlasticitySomatosensory CortexSpatio-Temporal AnalysisSynaptic TransmissionTonguecoherencelearningmotor cortexorofacial cortexsomatosensory cortex

Identifiers

PMID27091982
PMCPMC4983822

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.