Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27091836›Full record

SynthesisAnnals of the rheumatic diseases2016

Methotrexate dosage as a source of bias in biological trials in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic review.

Josefina Durán, Margarita Bockorny, Deepan Dalal, Michael LaValley, David T Felson

Open access · bronzeAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Annals of the rheumatic diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.7field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Josefina DuránRheumatology Department, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Margarita BockornyClinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Deepan DalalDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Brown University Warren Alpert School of Medicine, Providence, Rhode Island, USA.
Michael LaValleyClinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
David T FelsonClinical Epidemiology Unit, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA Arthritis Research UK Epidemiology Unit, Manchester NIHR Biomedical Research Unit, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Boston University · USBrown University · USPontificia Universidad Católica de Chile · CLUniversity of Manchester · GB

Funding

WORK DISABILITY-- PERSONS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITISP60AR047785 · NIAMS · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI FELSON, DAVID TOBIN · 2001 to 2016
$18.0M
NIAMS NIH HHS P60 AR047785
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo evaluate if optimal dose of either oral or injectable regimens of methotrexate (MTX) of 25 mg/week was used in the comparator arms of studies comparing biologic drugs with MTX in rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

methodsA systematic literature search was carried out in MEDLINE, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library databases for randomised controlled trials comparing biologics with MTX in RA. A systematic review was performed among studies that met predefined criteria focusing on assessment of dose of MTX used in the comparator arm. Study authors were contacted when necessary. Study quality was assessed.

resultsA total of 3276 references were identified and 13 trials were included. We obtained maximal dose and regimen for all. The maximal dose of MTX used in the comparator arm of the trials was no more than 20 mg/week in any trial and for all but one trial, MTX was given orally and not by injection. The trial that used an injectable form reached a maximum of 15 mg/week.

conclusionsA suboptimal dose of MTX was used in biological clinical trials performed in RA, particularly regarding route of administration. This may have biased findings in favour of biological agents.

Indexed as

Clinical Trials as TopicAdministration, OralAntirheumatic AgentsArthritis, RheumatoidBiasBiological ProductsHumansInjectionsMethotrexateAntirheumatic AgentsBiological ProductsMethotrexateDMARDs (biologic)MethotrexateRheumatoid Arthritis

Identifiers

PMID27091836
PMCPMC4982794
OpenAlexW2339410166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.