Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27091833›Full record

Trial reportBMJ supportive & palliative care2019

Training general practitioners contributes to the identification of palliative patients and to multidimensional care provision: secondary outcomes of an RCT.

Bregje Thoonsen, Stefanie H M Gerritzen, Kris C P Vissers, Stans Verhagen, Chris van Weel, Marieke Groot, Yvonne Engels

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in BMJ supportive & palliative care, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Bregje ThoonsenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Stefanie H M GerritzenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kris C P VissersDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Stans VerhagenDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Chris van WeelDepartment of Primary and Community Care, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Marieke GrootDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Yvonne EngelsDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Pain and Palliative Medicine, Radboudumc, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NLAustralian National University · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionTo support general practitioners (GPs) in providing early palliative care to patients with cancer, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or heart failure, the RADboud university medical centre indicators for PAlliative Care needs tool (RADPAC) and a training programme were developed to identify such patients and to facilitate anticipatory palliative care planning. We studied whether GPs, after 1 year of training, identified more palliative patients, and provided multidimensional and multidisciplinary care more often than untrained GPs.

methodsWe performed a survey 1 year after GPs in the intervention group of an RCT were trained. With the help of a questionnaire, all 134 GPs were asked how many palliative patients they had identified, and whether anticipatory care was provided. We studied number of identified palliative patients, expected lifetime, contact frequency, whether multidimensional care was provided and which other disciplines were involved.

resultsTrained GPs identified more palliative patients than did untrained GPs (median 3 vs 2; p 0.046) and more often provided multidimensional palliative care (p 0.024). In both groups, most identified patients had cancer.

conclusionsRADPAC sensitises GPs in the identification of palliative patients. Trained GPs more often provided multidimensional palliative care. Further adaptation and evaluation of the tools and training are necessary to improve early palliative care for patients with organ failure. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NTR2815; post results.

Indexed as

Patient Care PlanningAdultFemaleGeneral PractitionersHeart FailureHospice and Palliative Care NursingHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasmsPalliative CarePulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveReferral and ConsultationSurveys and Questionnairesanticipatory careearly palliative careGeneral practitioneridentificationtraining

Identifiers

PMID27091833
PMCPMC6579494
OpenAlexW2339928140

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.