Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27091807›Full record

ArticleAnnals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology2016

Tumor heterogeneity of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) mutations in invasive bladder cancer: implications for perioperative anti-FGFR3 treatment.

D Pouessel, Y Neuzillet, L S Mertens, M S van der Heijden, J de Jong, J Sanders, D Peters, K Leroy, A Manceau, P Maille and 29 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
6.6field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Exploration of targeted anti-tumor therapy · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Genomic Subtyping in Bladder Cancer.Current urology reports · 2020
    Review
  19. Genomic characterization for familial cases with urothelial carcinoma.International cancer conference journal · 2019
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

39 authors at 13 institutions in 8 countries.

D PouesselInserm U955, Hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Team 7 Translational Research of Genito-Urinary Oncogenesis, Créteil Department of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France.
Y NeuzilletDepartments of Surgical Oncology (Urology).
L S MertensDepartments of Surgical Oncology (Urology).
M S van der HeijdenMedical Oncology.
J de JongPathology.
J SandersPathology Molecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
D PetersMolecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
K LeroyTissue Biobank Unit.
A ManceauTissue Biobank Unit.
P MailleDepartments of Pathology.
P SoyeuxInserm U955, Hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Team 7 Translational Research of Genito-Urinary Oncogenesis, Créteil.
A MoktefiDepartments of Pathology.
F SemprezInserm U955, Hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Team 7 Translational Research of Genito-Urinary Oncogenesis, Créteil.
D VordosUrology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Créteil, France.
A de la TailleInserm U955, Hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Team 7 Translational Research of Genito-Urinary Oncogenesis, Créteil Urology, Hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Créteil, France.
C D HurstLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
D C TomlinsonLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
P HarndenLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
P J BostromDepartments of Urology Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto.
T MirttiPathology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
S HorenblasDepartments of Surgical Oncology (Urology).
Y LoriotDepartment of Cancer Medicine and INSERM U981, Gustave Roussy, Cancer Campus, Grand Paris, Villejuif.
N HouédéDepartment of Oncological Medicine, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux.
C ChevreauDepartment of Oncological Medicine, Institut Claudius Régaud, Toulouse.
P BeuzebocDepartment of Oncological Medicine, Institut Curie, Paris, France.
S F ShariatDepartments of Urology Department of Urology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna General Hospital, Vienna, Austria.
A I SagalowskyDepartments of Urology.
R AshfaqPathology, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, USA.
M BurgerDepartment of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
M A S JewettDepartment of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto.
A R ZlottaDepartment of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto Departments of Surgery (Urology).
A BroeksMolecular Pathology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Antoni van Leeuwenhoek Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
B BapatCancer Genetics, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto.
M A KnowlesLeeds Institute of Cancer and Pathology, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK.
Y LotanDepartments of Urology.
T H van der KwastDepartment of Pathology, University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
S CulineDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France Department of Medical Oncology, Paris 7 University, Paris.
Y AlloryInserm U955, Hôpital Henri Mondor, APHP, Team 7 Translational Research of Genito-Urinary Oncogenesis, Créteil Departments of Pathology Department of Pathology, Université Paris Est, UPEC, Créteil, France.
B W G van RhijnDepartments of Surgical Oncology (Urology) Department of Urology, Caritas St Josef Medical Centre, University of Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany Department of Surgical Oncology (Urology), University Health Network, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto Departments of Surgery (Urology) Cancer Genetics, Samuel Lunenfeld Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto b.v.rhijn@nki.nl.
Inserm · FRUniversity Health Network · CASt James's University Hospital · GBThe Netherlands Cancer Institute · NLInstitut Bergonié · FRInstitut Claudius Regaud · FRInstitut Curie · FRThe University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center · USUniversité Paris Cité · FRUniversity of Regensburg · DEUniversity of Toronto · CAUniversity of Turku · FIVienna General Hospital · AT

Funding

Cancer Research UK
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) is an actionable target in bladder cancer. Preclinical studies show that anti-FGFR3 treatment slows down tumor growth, suggesting that this tyrosine kinase receptor is a candidate for personalized bladder cancer treatment, particularly in patients with mutated FGFR3. We addressed tumor heterogeneity in a large multicenter, multi-laboratory study, as this may have significant impact on therapeutic response. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe evaluated possible FGFR3 heterogeneity by the PCR-SNaPshot method in the superficial and deep compartments of tumors obtained by transurethral resection (TUR, n = 61) and in radical cystectomy (RC, n = 614) specimens and corresponding cancer-positive lymph nodes (LN+, n = 201).

resultsWe found FGFR3 mutations in 13/34 (38%) T1 and 8/27 (30%) ≥T2-TUR samples, with 100% concordance between superficial and deeper parts in T1-TUR samples. Of eight FGFR3 mutant ≥T2-TUR samples, only 4 (50%) displayed the mutation in the deeper part. We found 67/614 (11%) FGFR3 mutations in RC specimens. FGFR3 mutation was associated with pN0 (P < 0.001) at RC. In 10/201 (5%) LN+, an FGFR3 mutation was found, all concordant with the corresponding RC specimen. In the remaining 191 cases, RC and LN+ were both wild type.

conclusionsFGFR3 mutation status seems promising to guide decision-making on adjuvant anti-FGFR3 therapy as it appeared homogeneous in RC and LN+. Based on the results of TUR, the deep part of the tumor needs to be assessed if neoadjuvant anti-FGFR3 treatment is considered. We conclude that studies on the heterogeneity of actionable molecular targets should precede clinical trials with these drugs in the perioperative setting.

Indexed as

AdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorClinical Decision-MakingCystectomyFemaleGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticGenetic HeterogeneityHumansLymph NodesMaleMiddle AgedMutationPerioperative PeriodReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3Urinary Bladder NeoplasmsBiomarkers, TumorFGFR3 protein, humanReceptor, Fibroblast Growth Factor, Type 3bladdercancerFGFR3heterogeneitymutationstargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID27091807
PMCPMC6608613
OpenAlexW2341235120

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.