Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27091608›Full record

ArticleHealth promotion practice2016

Assessing Patient Exposure to a Video-Based Intervention in STD Clinic Waiting Rooms: Findings From the Safe in the City Trial.

Ghenet T Besera, Shanna Cox, C Kevin Malotte, Cornelis A Rietmeijer, Jeffrey D Klausner, Lydia O'Donnell, Andrew D Margolis, Lee Warner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health promotion practice, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Teaching children about immunization in a digital age.Human vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2017
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Ghenet T BeseraCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA xwi5@cdc.gov.
Shanna CoxCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
C Kevin MalotteCalifornia State University-Long Beach, Long Beach, CA, USA.
Cornelis A RietmeijerRietmeijer Consulting, LLC, Denver, CO, USA.
Jeffrey D KlausnerUniversity of California-Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Lydia O'DonnellEducation Development Center, Inc., Waltham, MA, USA.
Andrew D MargolisCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Lee WarnerCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

CDC HHS U36/CCU300430Intramural CDC HHS CC999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Safe in the City, a video intervention for clinic waiting rooms, was previously shown to reduce sexually transmitted disease (STD) incidence. However, little is known about patients' recall of exposure to the intervention. Using data from a nested study of patients attending clinics during the trial, we assessed whether participants recalled Safe in the City, and, if so, how the intervention affected subsequent attitudes and behaviors. Analyses were restricted to responses to a 3-month follow-up questionnaire among participants who were exposed to the video (n = 708). Impact was measured as participants' reports of the video's effect on behaviors and attitudes. Associations were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression. Of participants who were exposed, 685 (97%) recalled viewing the video, and 68% recalled all three vignettes. After watching the video, participants felt more positive about condoms (69%) and comfortable acquiring condoms (56%), were reminded of important information about STDs and condoms (90%), and tried to apply what they learned to their lives (59%). Compared with those who recalled viewing one or two vignettes, participants who recalled viewing all three vignettes reported more positive attitudes toward condoms and peer/provider communication. These findings demonstrate that a low-resource video intervention for waiting rooms can provide sufficient exposure to positively influence STD-related attitudes/behaviors.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeSafe SexAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesCondomsFemaleHealth PromotionHispanic or LatinoHumansMaleSexually Transmitted DiseasesUnited StatesVideotape Recordinghealth communicationintervention exposureSTD clinicSTD preventionvideo intervention

Identifiers

PMID27091608
PMCPMC4980150

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.