ReviewAnnals of botany2016
Tinkering with transcription factor networks for developmental robustness of Ranunculales flowers.
Review in Annals of botany, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evolutionary analyses and expression patterns of TCP genes in Ranunculales.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Developmental stochasticity and variation in floral phyllotaxis.Journal of plant research · 2021Review
- Developmental mechanisms involved in the diversification of flowers.Nature plants · 2019Review
- Floral Organogenesis: When Knowing Your ABCs Is Not Enough.Plant physiology · 2017Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe flowers of core eudicots and monocots are generally determined by the number of floral organs they produce, and their developmental set-up tolerates little change from the bauplan once the floral primordium is initiated. Many species outside the core eudicots and monocots are more plastic in the number of floral organs they produce. For example, the Nymphaeales (water lilies), within the basal angiosperms, arrange their floral organs spirally and show smooth transitions between floral organs, and many Ranunculales (buttercups) produce variable numbers of stamens by adjusting the number of stamen whorls generated from a specialized ring meristem. However, the interactions of regulatory genes governing those processes are unknown. SCOPE AND
conclusionsThis review provides an overview of the functional analyses of floral homeotic genes carried out in Ranunculales, summarizing knockdown and mutant phenotypes, and protein interactions to identify similarities and differences within the Ranunculales and in comparison with core eudicots. Floral gene regulatory networks in Ranunculales are identified showing intensive re-wiring amongst the floral homeotic genes to allow some degree of plasticity. The 'fading-border' model of floral organ identity evolution is extended by a hypothesis on how developmental plasticity can be achieved by interdependent regulation of floral homeotic genes. One aspect of floral plasticity may be achieved by regulation of the activity of a stamen-generating ring meristem and first ideas on its control are presented. While the amazing conservation of the major floral organ identity programme is being unravelled by analysing floral homeotic gene function and expression, we are only just beginning to understand the evolution of the gene network governing the organ identity genes, e.g. how plasticity can be achieved, and which aspects foster the robustness of the core eudicot floral bauplan.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.