Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27091483›Full record

ReviewFuture cardiology2016

Hypertension: a problem of organ blood flow supply-demand mismatch.

Maarten P Koeners, Kirsty E Lewis, Anthony P Ford, Julian Fr Paton

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Future cardiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Transcriptome Study of 2 Black Cohorts RevealsJournal of the American Heart Association · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Intra-carotid body inter-cellular communication.Journal of the Royal Society of New Zealand · 2023
    Review
  9. Sympathetic-transduction in untreated hypertension.Journal of human hypertension · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Sensory signals mediating high blood pressure via sympathetic activation: role of adipose afferent reflex.American journal of physiology. Regulatory, integrative and comparative physiology · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maarten P KoenersSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Kirsty E LewisSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
Anthony P FordAfferent Pharmaceuticals, 2929 Campus Drive, San Mateo, CA, USA.
Julian Fr PatonSchool of Physiology, Pharmacology & Neuroscience, Biomedical Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
University of Bristol · GBSunesis (United States) · US

Funding

British Heart Foundation FS/14/2/30630British Heart Foundation RG/12/6/29670
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This review introduces a new hypothesis that sympathetically mediated hypertensive diseases are caused, in the most part, by the activation of visceral afferent systems that are connected to neural circuits generating sympathetic activity. We consider how organ hypoperfusion and blood flow supply-demand mismatch might lead to both sensory hyper-reflexia and aberrant afferent tonicity. We discuss how this may drive sympatho-excitatory-positive feedback and extend across multiple organs initiating, or at least amplifying, sympathetic hyperactivity. The latter, in turn, compounds the challenge to sufficient organ blood flow through heightened vasoconstriction that both maintains and exacerbates hypertension.

Indexed as

Feedback, PhysiologicalAfferent PathwaysCarotid BodyEfferent PathwaysHemodynamicsHomeostasisHumansHypertensionKidneyMuscle, SkeletalRegional Blood FlowSympathetic Nervous SystemVascular Resistancehypertensionhypoperfusionorgan blood flowsympathetic hyperactivityvisceral afferent hyper-reflexia

Identifiers

PMID27091483
PMCPMC4926521
OpenAlexW2335954791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.