ArticleBehavioural brain research2016
Sex differences, learning flexibility, and striatal dopamine D1 and D2 following adolescent drug exposure in rats.
Article in Behavioural brain research, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Effects of chronic fluoxetine treatment on anxiety- and depressive-like behaviors in adolescent rodents - systematic review and meta-analysis.Pharmacological reports : PR · 2022Pooled it
- Sex differences in the response to treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2026Review
- Early-life risperidone alters locomotor responses to apomorphine and quinpirole in adulthood.Behavioural brain research · 2024Article
- Methamphetamine increases risky choice in rats, but only when magnitude and probability of reinforcement are manipulated within a session.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2024Article
- Emotional and sensory dysregulation as a possible missing link in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: A review.Frontiers in behavioral neuroscience · 2023Review
- Sex Differences in Dopamine Receptors and Relevance to Neuropsychiatric Disorders.Brain sciences · 2021Review
- AMPed-up adolescents: The role of age in the abuse of amphetamines and its consequences on cognition and prefrontal cortex development.Pharmacology, biochemistry, and behavior · 2020Review
- Enduring effects of adolescent ketamine exposure on cocaine- and sucrose-induced reward in male and female C57BL/6 mice.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2020Article
- Prepubertal gonadectomy reveals sex differences in approach-avoidance behavior in adult mice.Hormones and behavior · 2020Article
- PharmGKB summary: methylphenidate pathway, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics.Pharmacogenetics and genomics · 2019Review
- Adolescent fluoxetine history impairs spatial memory in adult male, but not female, C57BL/6 mice.Journal of affective disorders · 2019Article
- Fluoxetine exposure in adolescent and adult female mice decreases cocaine and sucrose preference later in life.Journal of psychopharmacology (Oxford, England) · 2018Article
- Addiction and Dopamine: Sex Differences and Insights from Studies of Smoking.Current opinion in behavioral sciences · 2018Article
- Age- and sex-dependent effects of methamphetamine on cognitive flexibility and 5-HTBehavioural brain research · 2018Article
- Psychostimulants As Cognitive Enhancers in Adolescents: More Risk than Reward?Frontiers in public health · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Corticostriatal circuitry supports flexible reward learning and emotional behavior from the critical neurodevelopmental stage of adolescence through adulthood. It is still poorly understood how prescription drug exposure in adolescence may impact these outcomes in the long-term. We studied adolescent methylphenidate (MPH) and fluoxetine (FLX) exposure in rats and their impact on learning and emotion in adulthood. In Experiment 1, male and female rats were administered MPH, FLX, or saline (SAL), and compared with methamphetamine (mAMPH) treatment beginning in postnatal day (PND) 37. The rats were then tested on discrimination and reversal learning in adulthood. In Experiment 2, animals were administered MPH or SAL also beginning in PND 37 and later tested in adulthood for anxiety levels. In Experiment 3, we analyzed striatal dopamine D1 and D2 receptor expression in adulthood following either extensive learning (after Experiment 1) or more brief emotional measures (after Experiment 2). We found sex differences in discrimination learning and attenuated reversal learning after MPH and only sex differences in adulthood anxiety. In learners, there was enhanced striatal D1, but not D2, after either adolescent MPH or mAMPH. Lastly, also in learners, there was a sex x treatment group interaction for D2, but not D1, driven by the MPH-pretreated females, who expressed significantly higher D2 levels compared to SAL. These results show enduring effects of adolescent MPH on reversal learning in rats. Developmental psychostimulant exposure may interact with learning to enhance D1 expression in adulthood, and affect D2 expression in a sex-dependent manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.