Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27091225›Full record

ArticleExperimental neurology2016

Sensorimotor cortex injury effects on recovery of contralesional dexterous movements in Macaca mulatta.

Warren G Darling, Marc A Pizzimenti, Diane L Rotella, Stephanie M Hynes, Jizhi Ge, Kimberly Stilwell-Morecraft, Robert J Morecraft

Erratum issuedOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Experimental neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Warren G DarlingDepartment of Health and Human Physiology, Motor Control Laboratories, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States. Electronic address: warren-darling@uiowa.edu.
Marc A PizzimentiDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, Carver College of Medicine, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Diane L RotellaDepartment of Health and Human Physiology, Motor Control Laboratories, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Stephanie M HynesDepartment of Health and Human Physiology, Motor Control Laboratories, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA 52242, United States.
Jizhi GeDivision of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Laboratory of Neurological Sciences, The University of South Dakota, Sanford School of Medicine, Vermillion, SD 57069, United States.
Kimberly Stilwell-MorecraftDivision of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Laboratory of Neurological Sciences, The University of South Dakota, Sanford School of Medicine, Vermillion, SD 57069, United States.
Robert J MorecraftDivision of Basic Biomedical Sciences, Laboratory of Neurological Sciences, The University of South Dakota, Sanford School of Medicine, Vermillion, SD 57069, United States.
University of Iowa · USUniversity of South Dakota · US

Funding

Mechanisms of Motor Recovery after Subtotal Brain InjuryR01NS046367 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH DAKOTA · PI MORECRAFT, ROBERT J · 2004 to 2013
$3.2M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS046367
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The effects of primary somatosensory cortex (S1) injury on recovery of contralateral upper limb reaching and grasping were studied by comparing the consequences of isolated lesions to the arm/hand region of primary motor cortex (M1) and lateral premotor cortex (LPMC) to lesions of these same areas plus anterior parietal cortex (S1 and rostral area PE). We used multiple linear regression to assess the effects of gray and white matter lesion volumes on deficits in reaching and fine motor performance during the first month after the lesion, and during recovery of function over 3, 6 and 12months post-injury in 13 monkeys. Subjects with frontoparietal lesions exhibited larger deficits and poorer recovery as predicted, including one subject with extensive peri-Rolandic injury developing learned nonuse after showing signs of recovery. Regression analyses showed that total white matter lesion volume was strongly associated with initial post-lesion deficits in motor performance and with recovery of skill in reaching and manipulation. Multiple regression analyses using percent damage to caudal M1 (M1c), rostral S1 (S1r), LPMC and area PE as predictor variables showed that S1r lesion volumes were closely related to delayed post-lesion recovery of upper limb function, as well as lower skill level of recovery. In contrast, M1c lesion volume was related primarily to initial post-lesion deficits in hand motor performance. Overall, these findings demonstrate that frontoparietal injury impairs hand motor function more so than frontal motor injury alone, and results in slower and poorer recovery than lesions limited to frontal motor cortex.

Indexed as

AnimalsBrain InjuriesDisease Models, AnimalElectric StimulationFemaleFunctional LateralityHand StrengthMacaca mulattaMaleMotor CortexMovementPsychomotor PerformanceRange of Motion, ArticularRecovery of FunctionRegression AnalysisSensorimotor CortexBiomechanicsBrain injuryFrontal lobeGraspKinematicsMCA strokeParietal lobe

Identifiers

PMID27091225
PMCPMC4898655
OpenAlexW2338756197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.