Evidence map›Paper›PMID 27091142›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2016

Effectiveness of the delivery of interventions to prevent malaria in pregnancy in Kenya.

Stephanie Dellicour, Jenny Hill, Jane Bruce, Peter Ouma, Doris Marwanga, Peter Otieno, Meghna Desai, Mary J Hamel, Simon Kariuki, Jayne Webster

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
3.3field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 34 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Stephanie DellicourDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. stephanie.dellicour@lstmed.ac.uk.
Jenny HillDepartment of Clinical Sciences, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Jane BruceDisease Control Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Peter OumaMalaria Branch, Kenya Medical Research Institute Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Doris MarwangaMalaria Branch, Kenya Medical Research Institute Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Peter OtienoMalaria Branch, Kenya Medical Research Institute Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Meghna DesaiMalaria Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Mary J HamelMalaria Branch, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.
Simon KariukiMalaria Branch, Kenya Medical Research Institute Centre for Global Health Research, Kisumu, Kenya.
Jayne WebsterDisease Control Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Kenya Medical Research Institute · KECenters for Disease Control and Prevention · USLiverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCoverage with malaria in pregnancy interventions remains unacceptably low. Implementation research is needed to identify and quantify the bottlenecks for the delivery and use of these life-saving interventions through antenatal clinics (ANC).

methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out in ANC across nine health facilities in western Kenya. Data were collected for an individual ANC visit through structured observations and exit interviews with the same ANC clients. The cumulative and intermediate systems effectiveness for the delivery of intermittent preventive treatment (IPTp) and insecticide-treated nets (ITNs) to eligible pregnant women on this one specific visit to ANC were estimated.

resultsOverall the ANC systems effectiveness for delivering malaria in pregnancy interventions was suboptimal. Only 40 and 53 % of eligible women received IPTp by directly observed therapy as per policy in hospitals and health centres/dispensaries respectively. The overall systems effectiveness for the receipt of IPTp disregarding directly observed therapy was 62 and 72 % for hospitals and lower level health facilities, respectively. The overall systems effectiveness for ITNs for first ANC visit was 63 and 67 % for hospitals and lower level facilities, respectively.

conclusionThis study found that delivery of IPTp and ITNs through ANC was ineffective and more so for higher-level facilities. This illustrates missed opportunities and provider level bottlenecks to the scale up and use of interventions to control malaria in pregnancy delivered through ANC. The high level of clustering within health facilities suggest that future studies should assess the feasibility of implementing interventions to improve systems effectiveness tailored to the health facility level.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesAntimalarialsChildCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansInsecticide-Treated BednetsKenyaMalariaMiddle AgedPregnancyPregnancy Complications, ParasiticPrenatal CareYoung AdultAntimalarialsAntenatal careInsecticide-treated netsIntermittent preventive treatmentKenyaMalaria in pregnancyPredictorsService deliverySub-Saharan AfricaSystems effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID27091142
PMCPMC4835845
OpenAlexW2340118261

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.